Time: Thu Oct 31 05:58:06 1996 To: Harvey Wysong <hwysong@atl.mindspring.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Re: router testing Cc: Bcc: At 04:44 AM 10/27/96 -0500, you wrote: >Paul, > I believe that the "alt1.mindspring.com" should be >"atl.mindspring.com" (as in Atlanta.mindspring.com). Mindspring is actually >a far-flung empire now, and the city pops are inserted to help speed the >mail. That way -- I believe -- the mindspring systems don't have to search >for the local pop which serves the addressee. > I'm in Atlanta; Nancy's in Macon. An alternate address for Nancy is >"defense@macon.mindspring.com. > >-- Harvey Aha! I will try it immediately. Thank you very very much. /s/ Paul Mitchell > =================================== >At 02:26 PM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote: >>Harvey, >> >>I find two email addresses for you: >>the one this message came from, and >>the one you list in your "signature" >>at the end. Which one is current, >>the former? >> >>I am forwarding your message to the >>Primenet executive, for evidence that >>@mindspring.com is still working. >>Although, if your server is >>@alt1.mindspring.com, would this >>make a difference? >> >>Many thanks. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >> >>At 03:12 AM 10/27/96 -0500, you wrote: >>>At 07:58 AM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote: >>>>Dear Harvey, >>>> >>>>My email to Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com> >>>>is being blocked for some reason. I brought >>>>this to the attention of a senior manager >>>>at my ISP (Primenet). He investigated and >>>>recommended that we do some testing first. >>>>It was his suggestion that I try sending email >>>>to someone else @mindspring.com, and you came >>>>to mind immediately. So, if you do receive >>>>this message, would you be so kind as to >>>>acknowledge receipt, and I will forward the >>>>empirical evidence to Neal at Primenet >>>>headquarters? Thanks very much, Harvey. >>>> >>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>>> >>>>=========================================================== >>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>>>=========================================================== >>>> >>>> >>>You're coming in loud and clear. Nancy mentioned that she thought her mail >>>was evaporating. I wonder why she said a thing like that. >>> >>>-- Harvey >>> **************************************************** >>> TRIAL BY JURY PROTECTS ALL RIGHTS >>> **************************************************** >>> "If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt >>> for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it >>> invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the >>> criminal law the end justifies the means -- to declare that the >>> Government may commit crimes in order to secure the convic- >>> tion of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retributions." >>> --Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting, >>> Olmstead et al. v. United States, 277 U.S. 485 (1928) >>> **************************************************** >>> Please remember the above when you read about the deeds of >>> "confidential informants" on the government's payroll. >>> **************************************************** >>> Harvey Wysong >>> National Spokesman, Fully Informed Jury Association >>> 701 Longleaf Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, U.S.A. >>> hwysong@mindspring.com (404) 266-0930 >>> **************************************************** >>> >>> >> >>=========================================================== >>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>=========================================================== >> >> > **************************************************** > TRIAL BY JURY PROTECTS ALL RIGHTS > **************************************************** > "If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt > for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it > invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the > criminal law the end justifies the means -- to declare that the > Government may commit crimes in order to secure the convic- > tion of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retributions." > --Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting, > Olmstead et al. v. United States, 277 U.S. 485 (1928) > **************************************************** > Please remember the above when you read about the deeds of > "confidential informants" on the government's payroll. > **************************************************** > Harvey Wysong > National Spokesman, Fully Informed Jury Association > 701 Longleaf Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, U.S.A. > hwysong@mindspring.com (404) 266-0930 > **************************************************** > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail