Time: Thu Oct 31 06:12:10 1996 To: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Please forward to Nancy Lord] Cc: Bcc: Hi Nancy, This came from <defense@mingspring.com> Harvey tells me to use <defense@macon.mindspring.com> I tried it this morning, and it did not bounce. Did you get it? /s/ Paul Mitchell At 10:38 PM 10/30/96 -0500, you wrote: >>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 22:37:42 -0500 >>To: Electra Briggs <electra@texas.net> >>From: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com> <-------- Note >>Subject: Re: [Fwd: Please forward to Nancy Lord] >> >>At 08:05 PM 10/30/96 -0600, you wrote: >by mail1.texas.net (TxNet/Texas Net v1.2.2) with ESMTP id TAA23310 for ><electra@texas.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:18:47 -0600 (CST) >[198.68.42.149]) by primenet.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id SAA27622 for ><electra@texas.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:18:43 -0700 (MST) >>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:18:43 -0700 (MST) >>>To: <electra@texas.net> >>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>>Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord >>>Status: U >>> >>>At 08:05 PM 10/30/96 -0500, you wrote: >>>>Hi, >>>> Remember me? >>>> >>>>Your friend, >>>>Nancy >>> >>> >>>Hi Nancy, >>> >>>I most certainly do. >>>Are you OK? I am working >>>very hard on this problem. >>>Ugrr is cranking up again, >>>maybe nocal recipes, via >>>silicon valleys. Later. >> >> You still don't get it. Check >>where this one came from. I have >>another box. That's what I'm trying >>to tell you. When I check, it's still same 'ol <defense@mindspring.com> >> Now, since they know it anyway, >>it's league@macon.mindspring.com. See >>if that goes through. If it's just the >>kind of freak that Don was talking about, >>it should. I will try that too. Did you get "ping" to <defense@macon.mindspring.com>? /s/ Paul Mitchell >> If it doesn't, we are really in trouble. >>Though defense is a sub-box of league, >>so it may not work anyway, but I'd be >>real suspect. >> Don't use citizen. It's totally lost. >>I even posted JJ, he can't get it either. >> >>Nancy
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail