Time: Thu Oct 31 07:14:06 1996
To:
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Traveling is a right [7/7]
Cc:
Bcc: liberty lists
<snip>
>--------- Begin forwarded message ----------
>From: autarchic
>To: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
>Subject: Traveling is a right [7/7]
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:21:56 EST
>Message-ID: <19961030.141741.4327.20.autarchic@juno.com>
>
> >>> Part 7 of 7...
>
> Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43.
>
>95. The Emphasized statement is also consistent with North
>Carolina statute. In the statute reads: Common law in force. The
>common law of England, as far as it is not repugnant to or
>inconsistent with the Constitution or laws of the United States in all
>cases not provided for in these compiled laws, is the rule of decision
>in all courts in this state. Since the statutes of the North Carolina
>General Statutes cannot apply to this Sovereign, he becomes subject to
>the Common Law that maintains that he owes nothing to the public while
>he does not trespass upon their "RIGHTS."
>
>96. Is it the contention of this Sovereign that because the
>statutes contained in the North Carolina General Statutes do not apply
>to him that the statutes are unconstitutional? Absolutely not. There
>is a class of persons in North Carolina to whom these statutes apply
>without reservation. Members of this class include corporations and
>those who do the corporation business on the streets or highways in
>North Carolina. A corporation is the creation of the State.
>
> 96.1 A corporation is a creature of the State. It is
> presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public.
> It receives certain special privileges and franchises and
> holds them, subject to the laws of the State and the
> limitations of its charter. Its "RIGHTS" to act as a
> corporation are only preserved to it while it obeys the laws
> of its creation. (Emphasis added).
> See:
> Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914 p. 684
>
>97. It is a person in the eyes of the law but it lacks
>character, no morals, no conscience. It's every activity must be
>directed and supervised by the State. Under the definition of Due
>Process of Law, Bouvier's Law Dictionary states in part:
>
> 97.1 The liberty guaranteed is that of a natural person
> and not of artificial persons; Western Turf Assn. v.
> Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359 where it was said "a corporation
> cannot be deemed a Citizen within the meaning of the clause
> of the Constitution of the United States which protects the
> privileges and immunities of Citizens of the United States
> against being abridged or impaired by the law of a state."
> (See also 203 U.S. 243).
>
>98. The statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes are
>designed to direct the activities of the class of persons of which a
>corporation is a member. Corporations are absolutely bound by these
>statutes. It is imperative that a conscienceless entity not be allowed
>to roam the streets or highways in North Carolina and jeopardize the
>Sovereigns. It is for this purpose that the statutes of the North
>Carolina General Statutes were enacted and not for the control of a
>Free and Natural Sovereign.
>
> CONCLUSION
>
>99. There is no Court in This Land that could Lawfully execute
>an Order that would or could cause, or work to compel, One to become a
>servant or slave of any city, county or state without a conviction and
>with full due process of law, and for any city, county or state to
>pretend otherwise is an absurdity.
>
> There you have it folks. What do you think? Have you been lied to
>by our public servants again? I would bet big money that we have!
>
>Steadfastly, John Freeman
>... A seminar on Time Travel will be held two weeks ago!
>--------- End forwarded message ----------
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail