Time: Fri Nov 01 18:06:52 1996
To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: DRED SCOTT
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 07:47 PM 11/1/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 01:41 PM 10/31/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>Dear Norman,
>>
>>You are very welcome.
>>
>>"Citizenship" is my specialty.
>>
>>I am standing by.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>        Interesting.  See how they try to throw
>the guy out of court, then scream discrimination.
>Could be great. 

Oh, I know.  NAACP Legal Foundation
would probably step into that one,
don't you think?  Kweisi Mfume was
once a Congressman, not so long ago.
He's their new director.
 
>        But, Paul, get a plaintiff who's not on phenothiazines,
>or needing them.  Please.

How do you know, without asking them first?  :)
If I need some, can you prescribe?  8-]
(Hint: will you doctor me?)


>
>Nancy
>>
>>
>>
>>At 03:28 PM 10/31/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>>Paul,
>>>
>>>   Thank you so much for your interest and support in 
>>>this matter.  The 14th and the Dred Scott situation
>>>didn't make things any better, but has worked to divide
>>>people even more.  The black Americans I've talked to
>>>are ready to apply for formal citizenship and become
>>>"twice citizens" that is, once by birth, and another
>>>time by naturalization...  They effectively will be
>>>"twice the citizens" that the rest of us are...
>>>
>>>Let the federal courts try to unravel that one!!
>>>
>>>Kind Regards,
>>>
>>>Norm Olson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>>
>>>> At 09:05 AM 10/31/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >Now a question for you Robert.
>>>> >
>>>> >   I have been working with people in Detroit who recognize
>>>> >their limitations under the Constitution.  A significant number
>>>> >of these people have asked me if they should apply for citizenship.
>>>> >If they do, and they are accepted by the US Government, will they
>>>> >be regarded as people having the same rights and guarantees as the
>>>> >rest of us white folks?
>>>> 
>>>> Have them apply to state Superior Court
>>>> for naturalization as state Citizens.
>>>> The authority for this is Ex parte Knowles,
>>>> 5 Cal. 300:  Congress makes the rules,
>>>> the states implement the rules.   This
>>>> case is still standing.  If we must repeat
>>>> the errors made after Dred Scott, let's
>>>> at least learn from those errors this time.
>>>> Taney put it very plainly:  if you find
>>>> apartheid offensive, there is a mechanism
>>>> in the Constitution for changing it, so
>>>> as to abolish apartheid.  From that,
>>>> we got the 14th amendment [sic].  See
>>>> Dyett v. Turner for proof that Congress
>>>> botched it horribly, and we still suffer
>>>> from that grievous breach of lawful conduct.
>>>> 
>>>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>> 
>>>> ===========================================================
>>>> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>> ===========================================================
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>
>>====================================================================
>>[Text is usually formatted in Courier 11 non-proportional spacing @]
>>[65-characters per line; .DOCs by MS-WORD for MS-DOS, Version 5.0B.]
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., email address: pmitch@primenet.com      
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state [We win]
>>We can decode all your byte streams, spaghetti code notwithstanding.
>>Coming soon: "Manifesto for a Republic" by John E. Trumane ie JetMan
>>====================================================================
>>
>>
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail