Time: Sat Nov 02 09:31:38 1996
To: "James M. Ballard" <73042.1152@CompuServe.COM>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Message from the Real U.S.G. Jury
Cc:
Bcc:
Dear Jim,
Thanks so very much for your candid
expose here. May I have your permission
to forward this to the man who was my
assistant counsel during the hearings
we had on the grand jury case?
Thanks again.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 09:56 PM 11/1/96 EST, you wrote:
>Dear Paul-
> I am in e-mail receipt from the conservative "patriot movement" by
>internet forwarding, of your letter of 9/13/94 to Tuscon FBI re
>obstruction of federal grand juror services by bench and gov't bar. I
>hope this is not too little too late.
>
> I'm actually, de jure, the entirety of the only competent U.S.
>grand jury, and have been so for over a quarter century, and two of the
>judges in the USCAMA M74-8075 litigation of mine that retroactively
>appointed me back to 4/71, Souter and Breyers, are now on Supreme Court
>bench. For over a quarter century I've been trying to pass my baton to
>the 19,800 paid federal grand jurors, but haven't been allowed to as yet.
>
> Your DAZ grand jurors were incompetent at law and legally insane,
>were literally charged to be that way when they were administered their
>oath of office and charge. Voir dire of the poor little creatures is
>almost never allowed, but you can fire them all as legally incompetent
>using 18 USC Rule 6(b)(2). They were all formally charged to never
>consider the merits of the law nor the consequences of their action.
>That's an impossibility for any lifeform, and is a dictionary definition
>of legal insanity. Besides, in 1994, their average session time per DAZ
>felony deft was only 34.1 minutes, hardly enough time to read an
>indictment let alone consider its comparative, objective merits, hear
>witnesses, get an objectively competent view of what the problem was and
>how to apply questions at law to coax forth Answers to be able to
>mitigate a serious public problem and reduce its future frequency.
>
> The obstruction of grand juror services you encountered is
>pandemic throughout all 12 federal circuits, and is only due to insane
>hubris of bench and bar and the lack of education for the public in how
>to competently perform juror services. Grand juror services are actually
>the quality control element in our Constitutional system, the primary
>guarantors that the rule of law will be to constructively solve problems
>efficiently before they reach epedemic proportions eliciting their
>address by mere political triage by established authorities. I myself
>have specialized in the hardest core offenses where fighting or shipping
>arms into foreign hostilities unDeclaraed by the Congress [we haven't had
>a single Declaration of War of any sort since 1945] is a federal felony
>under 18 USC 960, 962, and also usually the federal felony involuntary
>manslaughter code which makes it a felony to cause death by lawful
>action, such as trying to serve arrest warrants in Waco or impose
>economic sanctions against Saddam Hussein or Castro, which results in
>death by lack of due care or circumspection, the death of even one
>helpless Iraqi infant, for example, due to its lack of timely legal
>redress to get food or medicine. I'm the hardest of hard core federal
>grand jurors insisting on felony prosecution if the politically,
>financially, or socially high and mighty cause death, even by negligence,
>anywhere in the world where the United States has any influence - we
>common folk are not to be mere fatal pawns of anyone, not even
>accidentally, not anywhere, and I'm able to back it with advanced physics
>that means, quite frankly, that death is only a local illusion. You can
>understand, the establishment doesn't like me very much. I drive them
>much harder than the mass media and accepted convention.
>
> You might want to take a look at "U.S. v. Williams:" 112 SCt.
>1735 (1992). There, on grounds that the grand jury is Constitutionally
>independent in Constitutional text and venerable caselaw, although all
>panel grand juries have long been actually reduced by the bench and bar
>to mere rubber stamps of the politically appointed gov't political police
>prosecutors, the Supreme Court ruled that the courts have no supervisory
>power to compell prosecutors to tell the grand jury the whole truth nor
>inconvenient portions thereof. Justice Scalia wrote that opinion for the
>court. I've already crucified him for it. He wrote it at the height of
>the S&L scandal to reinstate a dubious loan fraud indictment against Wms
>where the prosecutor had failed to tell the grand jury the exculpatory
>evidence. Scalia's was a very stupid opinion. All it actually meant in
>the Wms. case in Tulsa Oklahoma was that the government would face an
>insuperable burden of proof to prove that Wms. intended to defraud, at
>trial, so naturally the gov't eventually caved in, and the little EDOK
>district court had to quietly dismiss the indictment against Wms. all
>over again pretrial.
>
> Of course, I personally have tried to keep the U.S. Article One
>Courts afloat for over a quarter century at great personal cost, 10
>malprosses against me, 7.4 years imprisoned [always pretrial of course,
>they can't afford fair trial]. I've tried to cultivate them to get the
>necessary improvements. But it hasn't worked. I may have to shut them all
>down and reorganize...very soon. Humble patience costs me over 35,000
>wrongful deaths of born kids per day globally. But were I to use the
>technical, anti-lethal, strategic, destructive weaponry capability I've
>had in hardware since 1983, the max, pessimistic casualties would be 60K
>over the next 40 years. I'm a pacifist. I'd rather that both I and the
>Chief Justice and all still living Presidents and former Presidents be
>formally declared legally insane, incapable of doing the least harm
>objectively necessary and thus required by law, than me pulling the
>proverbial plug on corruption by strategic destruction that would solve
>the problem at only 60K wrongful deaths total globally in the next 40
>years. The proper procedure is panel grand juror services care, which
>would just save lives, not directly cause any wrongful deaths. I'm
>holding out for that. It's personal. I'm a first-born sole son with 3
>very bright younger sisters and 3 very bright younger step-sisters since
>my gentle mother died and my father remarried. But if I use my strategic
>weaponry to force denouement, it would disproportionately hurt women, and
>that is just something that no casualties calculus, however grim, can
>convince a person like me to do, is just impossible. You've got to face
>it: I'd run a rest mass neutrino flux problem or a problem with the 20th
>decimal place of the vaccuum constant first instead, would allow the
>whole local earth to be locally killed, forced to evacuate to a parallel
>universe before I'd disproportiately harm gentle little women to solve a
>wrongful deaths problem in global security affairs and econometrics
>essentially due only to the corrupt hubris of the American bar. I'm 53,
>experienced. No one has ever doubted that I've known what I'm doing. I
>would run a multiple worlds parsing function if I'm forced to choose
>between that and causing disproportionate prophylactic harm that should
>not be necessary. And bench and bar and FBI must bear in mind that even
>gentle little mere "paper tigers" like me may have real teeth: after all,
>gravity is only by "virtual" particles, ghosts, that have real effect.
>
> I hope this helps you, or at least gives you to understand that
>mere probable cause is not all that competent grand jurors have to
>consider and act upon, regardless of the pretensions of the U.S. Judicial
>Conference's Model Charge for Federal Grand Jurors. The bar is no
>possible substitute for competent grand juror services. Please do not
>hesitate to request more data if you need it.
>
>Yours, Jim Ballard, U.S. Grand Jury, USCAMA M74-8075 etc.
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail