Time: Sat Nov 02 15:44:20 1996
To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Gulf War Syndrome (GWS)
Cc:
Bcc:
At 02:08 PM 11/2/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 10:06 AM 11/2/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Dear Nancy,
>>
>>Have you considered becoming active
>>in the effort to expose what really
>>happened to all the GI's who fought
>>in Desert Storm?
>
> I've talked with Joyce. She and David are
>a lot of fun. I'm interested, but the impression
>I get is that there's not much money there.
We can organize a nationwide organization,
under "authority" of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), and kick butts
inside the Pentagon and out. This will
be a giant spring-board to coalesce lots
of disabled persons, who will benefit
from our knowledge of computers, law, and
basic economics. Computer suppliers will
flood us with discounted hardware. What
do you think?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
> The usual. Food. Rent. It's always a problem.
>Had an idea I might as well run by (a friend of mine
>might have some work for me in the NW): IF I'm filing
>bankruptcy & dumping the Acura, AND I need to
>get cross country, why not dump the car first, at
>the dealers, with a note like you suggested, and
>JUST DRIVE THE TRUCK!!
Now you're talking?
Rule #1: don't get attached
to your car, unless you are
already in love with it.
There are warmer motors to
fall in love with, remember that!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. Whew! Narrowly escaped the
metaphor of the year just then.
It will save on gas not
>to haul a car, and I can't get my stuff out by car
>anyway.
> What do you think?
You have my full support for such
an idea. Can you afford to buy
a clunker, say $500 for some old
gas hog, so you can sell your
equity in the Acura first? That
makes the most sense. This is a
"lead-time" problem which you can
solve by deciding now to dump the
Acura, and then take steps to
liquidate your interest in it,
with plenty of time to prepare for
your Ryder adventure, avec Paul
and Gideon (or is it "Gideon and
Paul"?). Please advise. :)
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. Gids can sit in my lap,
but he cannot operate the Ryder.
Deal?
>
> Your credentials
>>could not be more tailor-made to
>>the job. Why don't you test the
>>waters, and see if there is any
>>money available, from Veterans
>>groups and the lik? I have a
>>veterans group just around the
>>corner, and I drop anonymous
>>"bomb shells" in their door slot
>>as I walk by to buy meals at the
>>local restaurants. I could test
>>the waters for you too. I am going
>>to make you famous.
>
> I'm already famous. Now I'm working on
>getting rich. You know, "rich & famous" the
>old cliche? Only with me, somebody decided
>to skip the rich part.
You could run for Congress,
then you will have all the
money you could ever dream of 8-[
(assming you got elected).
> I liked your idea about Saddam. That
>really makes sense.
> But sure, if you can come up with a grant
>or something, I'd love to work on it. It's exactly
>what I used to do for plaintiff's lawyers -- prove
>a causal connection between a disease and a
>toxin.
Here is my fantasy: by reaching out
to various Veterans' groups all across
the country, the Supreme Law Firm will
establish one excellent reputation for
life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. These veterans have lots of
contacts within active military ranks;
the active GI's will provide us lots
of opportunities to organize them to
support judicial reform efforts. So,
on top of the humanitarian motives,
I also have additional political motives
which can be served by organizing the
Veterans. This is the first time I have
verbalized this idea. What do you think?
If you find serious problems, fire away!!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
> Either that,
>>or Gideon is going to make you
>>infamous. Those are your choices,
>>dear heart. :)
>
> Gideon is already infamous. His path of
>destruction is nationwide.
Better, or worse, than
Sherman's March to the Sea?
By the way, there
>are some lab mix puppies available, and he's
>pretty lonely, I'll probably get one tomorrow.
OH NO!! I just LOVE laboradors.
Will this be a "mate" for Gids,
or just a "playmate"? There is
a difference, you know. :)
/s/ Paul Mitchell
P.S. He doesn't EAT puppies, does he?
(I am just asking the "obvious" question here.)
This will be an excellent start to obedience
school: K-9 stewardship begins at home.
>But first I'm going to check with my friend in LA
>about getting my cat back, though travelling with
>a cat is a real nightmare. They run off. You have
>to trank 'em.
You can get the goods, I presume.
Let's see: planes/trains/boats/cars/
dogs/cats/and puppies. You may have
to spend lots of time curling your
hair in the vanity mirror, because
I may be tied up with animal farm.
Depending on how nice you are to me
on this Ryder Adventure ("RA"), you
may find that the animals are winning
the competition for love and affection.
Forewarned is forearmed. (Same goes
for me, too, yes?)
>
>Yours,
could be, yes.
I am open to discussing it.
Do you cook? :)
(Say "yes", pleeeeze.)
I wash toilets, did you know?
>Nancy
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail