Time: Sun Nov 03 18:52:31 1996 To: Nancy Lord From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: FYI Cc: Bcc: MEMO TO: Dr. Edwin J. Vieira, Jr. 13877 Napa Drive Independent Hill, Virginia Postal Zone <22111> FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law DATE: November 3, 1996 SUBJECT: Request for Support Dear Dr. Vieira, You may not remember me, but I was the one who worked with you briefly to produce the official transcript of your address in the fall of 1991 to the National Coalition to Reform Money and Taxes ("NCRMT"). I was working under a pen name at that time ("Mitch Modeleski"). I continue to do much of my own research on a shoestring budget, and I wanted to enclose some of the more exemplary results of our latest research, for your review and possible comment. Perhaps the most astounding "thread," if you will, begins with the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), and the court of original jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from improperly withholding documents requested under FOIA. See "Karma and the Federal Courts" for a brief summary of those findings. The method we have developed in all federal cases now is to begin with a FOIA request for the credentials of all government employees who even touch the case. This ultimately vaults us into the District Court of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). Administrative remedies are completely exhausted after one request letter, and one appeal letter. We are now using this strategy to put real political pressure on the U.S. Supreme Court, because there are no sitting federal judges who are currently qualified to preside over the District Court of the United States. They are all paying federal income taxes on their compensation, in violation of Article III, Section 1, and Evans v. Gore, decided in 1920. I would be more than honored to re-open the communication we began so many years ago. Your advice and immense insight would be extremely valuable to us at this point in time. I would also appreciate any financial assistance you, or others you might know, could provide to me at this difficult juncture. We are making plans that offer an ambitious web page, a nationwide tour called the Supreme Law Seminars, and a Supreme Law Firm (all unlicensed Counselors at Law). Memo to Dr. Edwin J. Vieira: Page 1 of 2 Would you be available to assist us, perhaps as a Member of the Board of Directors, or similar office? I have been hearing rumors that you are very embittered with the American Judiciary at the present time. Believe me, I share your frustration completely, if those rumors are true. My commitment to this cause derives from knowing that the number of alternatives to violence is getting rather small, but I have yet to exhaust all the judicial remedies of which I am still aware. If and when that happens, I will be facing the same situation my father faced when he hit the beach at Iwo Jima, carrying a loaded 50-caliber machine gun to the base of Mt. Surabachi. Whatever you may decide, I would certainly enjoy hearing from you very soon. Do you have an email address that you would be willing to share with me, by any chance? I am very active on the Internet, having had more than 25 years of professional experience in advanced systems development. You might say I am a "computer nerd," on top of aspiring to be a reputable Counselor at Law (against heavy odds). Good luck to you, Edwin, and if I do not hear from you soon, please accept my sincere and best wishes for a happy holiday season, and a blessed new year for you, and all of your immediate family and friends. Sincerely yours, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law and federal witness c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson, Arizona state Postal Zone 85719/tdc email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro) tel: (520) 320-1514 (private line) (please request permission to share) fax: (520) 320-1513 (dedicated Internet line) (call: 520-320-1514 first to switch software) Memo to Dr. Edwin J. Vieira: Page 2 of 2
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail