Time: Wed Nov 06 08:48:42 1996
To: joseph.d.robertson@nhmccd.cc.tx.us
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: People v. United States
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 06:31:27
>To: Liberty Law
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: People v. United States
>Bcc: Neil Nordbrock, Electra, Alfred Adask, Art Bell, Bernie Oliver, Chris Wilder, Dean, Denver newspapers, Jean-Pierre Weingarten, Jim McCall, Joe Newman, Marcia A. Armstrong, Nancy Lord, Richard Ginn, Richard McDonald, The Arizona Republic, Tucson Citizen, TV stations, William Cooper
>
>Dear America,
>
>Lest we forget: People v. United States et al.
>was filed in Garfield county court to obtain
>a TRO against the FBI to restrain them from
>using lethal force against the Montana Freemen,
>and to enjoin the United States from depriving
>anyone of life, liberty, or property without
>due process of law. After some skirmishing,
>Judge Kenneth Wilson has permitted the removal
>of said case into federal court, but he erred
>by ordering removal into the United States
>District Court (USDC). This is not only the wrong court,
>but he had no motion before him to authorize
>removal; that motion is before the DCUS, which
>is awaiting the assignment of a 3-judge panel
>before it can issue any relief whatsoever
>(no judge, no relief).
>
>The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has been
>served with a formal Notice and Demand to
>prepare a certificate of necessity for Rehnquist
>to locate and assign 3 competent and qualified
>judges, whose compensations are not being diminished
>by federal income taxes. When we find just one,
>it will send a shock wave through Wall Street,
>the likes of which they have never seen. Rehnquist
>is smiling, because he knows our last move was
>a "fork" in chess: they lose either way on this
>round. We are playing serious chess here, in
>case you haven't noticed.
>
>My mail is not being forwarded from
>The Freedom Center, so I have not received
>any communications from the DCUS to date, other
>than a conformed copy of the original Petition
>for Warrant of Removal. I have requested the
>assistance of the Postmaster in Billings,
>in writing. I am also communicating in
>writing with other officials in Montana.
>
>Things are moving very VERY slowly, too
>slowly for my liking. The esssay "Karma and
>the Federal Courts" has hit the streets, and
>it has lots of people hopping mad: U.S.
>incarceration rate 2x that of South Africa,
>which is second in the world in prisoners
>per capita. "The Kick-Back Racket" is making
>people even more angry. The United States is
>in a terrible legal situation at present,
>and they know it. A vacuum is forming, and
>lots of strange things happen in a strong
>vacuum.
>
>I am trying to keep the channels
>of communication open to the Ninth Circuit
>(Judge Alex Kozinski in Pasadena) and to the
>Supreme Court (Rehnquist gets courtesy copies
>of all important documents). Judging from the
>way I was treated when I discovered that
>Elizabeth Broderick had rubber-stamped her
>liens with a bogus court, it would not surprise
>me if the "powers that be" have decreed that I
>will not be allowed to succeed with People
>v. United States either.
>
>The Supremes' decision to punt in the
>face of a challenge by 16 federal judges
>to more SSA taxes, was very revealing.
>The issue of judicial compensation is hotter than
>a freshly baked potato at present; it will be
>their undoing, because of cases like Lord v.
>Kelley (I have been misspelling "Kelley" as "Kelly")
>and, more importantly, Evans v. Gore (the pivotal
>holding). Don't forget, we have newly found
>evidence, namely, People v. Boxer, which makes
>Evans even stronger, because there is no
>16th Amendment; it is res judicata (a secret
>not so well concealed).
>
>I am executing the plan which I published here
>and elsewhere on the Internet some weeks ago.
>Serious problems have arisen as a result of the
>failure by The Freedom Center to pay me for
>the time, and at the rate, which I quoted to
>them in writing, using email. For the record,
>I have located that quotation, and I have
>printed it out and put it in a safe place.
>I can post that quotation here, as needed.
>
>While on location in Billings for 18.5 days,
>I worked an average of 16 hours per day, and
>invoiced them for 8 of those 16, per day.
>I now have reasons to believe that my strategy
>is being scuttled, by forces which are not
>entirely known to me at this time. Red Beckman
>has fallen totally silent, which surprises me
>no end. The specter of apartheid has raised
>its ugly head, because some of the Montana Freemen
>are avowed white supremacists. I tried to
>avoid that matter as much as possible, but
>staff of The Freedom Center went out of
>their way to spend my time debating the
>biblical foundation for apartheid. For this
>reason, and for this reason alone, I may never
>return to The Freedom Center, because the
>"feelings" may be mutual. For the record,
>I am personally disgusted with apartheid,
>and I am willing to fight to expel apartheid
>from the freedom movement. What an oxymoron!
>
>The two "interlopers" (as I call them)
>did very little but waste my time (4 days) and
>basically insulted me when they handed me
>an illegible, penciled brief which I could not
>read and, when I finally did get their help
>to decipher the illegible words, the brief had
>the wrong parties, wrong court, and wrong action.
>But, I was expected to be their clerical secretary
>with an unacceptably poor draft of a pleading
>which was mostly nonsense, in my honest opinion.
>I never hand anyone else such poorly written
>and poorly styled drafts; I compose at a
>computer terminal, and use the Internet as
>my broadcast tower. I didn't spend 25 years
>in the computer industry twiddling my thumbs.
>The Internet has been the vivid dream of tens of
>thousands of Americans who conceived and built
>the most utterly fantastic noosphere ever
>witnessed by planet earth. So, tell me I
>don't know what I am doing. I am all ears.
>
>You might want to ask Randy Parsons to relate
>what happened after that. One of the interlopers
>almost fell down the stairwell, he was backing
>up so fast. One more step backwards, and he
>would have found himself in the basement. This
>man also claimed to have contacts with the
>Queen of England, and was just "days" away from
>having this huge account in Europe which we could
>utilize to fund the litigation. Still waiting,
>D & C! You know who you are. Have you read
>Title 28 yet? Trojan Horse, these two.
>
>It is encouraging that some courts are now ruling
>that commercial liens cannot be perfected without
>the debtor's signature. If that holding prevails,
>they will have, unwittingly, destroyed each and
>every single Notice of Federal Tax Lien ever filed
>with a county recorder, anywhere in America, because
>I know for a fact that the IRS does not bother
>getting "debtors" to sign those bogus Notices.
>
>The question of commercial lien validity is a
>perfectly good issue to litigate thoroughly, and
>that is one of the issues we plan to litigate in
>People v. United States. I think that America has
>failed to grasp just how much power is available to
>such a 3-judge panel. For example, they would have
>the power to dissolve all Notices of Federal Tax Lien
>on the strength of this one question: does the
>debtor need to sign it? Also, such a 3-judge panel
>can hear bankruptcy matters; the People could declare
>voluntary bankruptcy, and force the IMF to file a
>"Proof of Claim" form for ALL of their claim(s)
>against the American People. Are we, quite possibly,
>looking at a Jubilee Year now, for the first time
>in American history? Now, wouldn't that be music
>to our ears?
>
>I can easily offset the IMF claim with
>proof that thousands of Americans have been placed
>in prison by courts which never had any criminal
>jurisdiction whatsoever; these are torts for
>unlawful imprisonment which carry very heavy damages.
>I have one client who, as a federal witness, experienced
>200 separate events of retaliation; @ $250,000 per
>event, the United States owes him $50 million, not
>counting all the other criminal violations which have
>been committed against him and his family since the
>year 1982.
>
>The DCUS has the POWER to hear all these
>matters, and accordingly, it has the POWER to issue
>relief on all these matters. Whether LeRoy Michael
>Schweitzer wants to remove all his actions into the
>same court is up to him; he is still a Freeman,
>even in chains. The court is there; it has always
>been there. It is now time that we dust off judicial
>power and start to energize it. The only way to do
>that is to take control of the action by filing as
>Plaintiffs. This, We the People, have already done.
>I invite you to join us. The effort is not fruitless,
>as so many are now implying. It does become very
>difficult when people don't pay you for a job well
>done. "A man is worthy of his hire," I seem to have
>read in several disk files produced by Mr. Schweitzer.
>
>I rest for now. I am very tired, particularly from
>expending all the energy that was required to surround
>the Centers for Disease Control with a spiritual force
>field, for their complicity in the Gulf War Illnesses.
>My batteries just need a little re-charging. People
>are falling by the wayside like flies; the Holy Spirit
>is actually in charge here, and many "persons" don't
>know that, and never will.
>
>Amen.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail