Time: Wed Nov 06 08:48:42 1996 To: joseph.d.robertson@nhmccd.cc.tx.us From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: People v. United States Cc: Bcc: >Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 06:31:27 >To: Liberty Law >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: People v. United States >Bcc: Neil Nordbrock, Electra, Alfred Adask, Art Bell, Bernie Oliver, Chris Wilder, Dean, Denver newspapers, Jean-Pierre Weingarten, Jim McCall, Joe Newman, Marcia A. Armstrong, Nancy Lord, Richard Ginn, Richard McDonald, The Arizona Republic, Tucson Citizen, TV stations, William Cooper > >Dear America, > >Lest we forget: People v. United States et al. >was filed in Garfield county court to obtain >a TRO against the FBI to restrain them from >using lethal force against the Montana Freemen, >and to enjoin the United States from depriving >anyone of life, liberty, or property without >due process of law. After some skirmishing, >Judge Kenneth Wilson has permitted the removal >of said case into federal court, but he erred >by ordering removal into the United States >District Court (USDC). This is not only the wrong court, >but he had no motion before him to authorize >removal; that motion is before the DCUS, which >is awaiting the assignment of a 3-judge panel >before it can issue any relief whatsoever >(no judge, no relief). > >The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has been >served with a formal Notice and Demand to >prepare a certificate of necessity for Rehnquist >to locate and assign 3 competent and qualified >judges, whose compensations are not being diminished >by federal income taxes. When we find just one, >it will send a shock wave through Wall Street, >the likes of which they have never seen. Rehnquist >is smiling, because he knows our last move was >a "fork" in chess: they lose either way on this >round. We are playing serious chess here, in >case you haven't noticed. > >My mail is not being forwarded from >The Freedom Center, so I have not received >any communications from the DCUS to date, other >than a conformed copy of the original Petition >for Warrant of Removal. I have requested the >assistance of the Postmaster in Billings, >in writing. I am also communicating in >writing with other officials in Montana. > >Things are moving very VERY slowly, too >slowly for my liking. The esssay "Karma and >the Federal Courts" has hit the streets, and >it has lots of people hopping mad: U.S. >incarceration rate 2x that of South Africa, >which is second in the world in prisoners >per capita. "The Kick-Back Racket" is making >people even more angry. The United States is >in a terrible legal situation at present, >and they know it. A vacuum is forming, and >lots of strange things happen in a strong >vacuum. > >I am trying to keep the channels >of communication open to the Ninth Circuit >(Judge Alex Kozinski in Pasadena) and to the >Supreme Court (Rehnquist gets courtesy copies >of all important documents). Judging from the >way I was treated when I discovered that >Elizabeth Broderick had rubber-stamped her >liens with a bogus court, it would not surprise >me if the "powers that be" have decreed that I >will not be allowed to succeed with People >v. United States either. > >The Supremes' decision to punt in the >face of a challenge by 16 federal judges >to more SSA taxes, was very revealing. >The issue of judicial compensation is hotter than >a freshly baked potato at present; it will be >their undoing, because of cases like Lord v. >Kelley (I have been misspelling "Kelley" as "Kelly") >and, more importantly, Evans v. Gore (the pivotal >holding). Don't forget, we have newly found >evidence, namely, People v. Boxer, which makes >Evans even stronger, because there is no >16th Amendment; it is res judicata (a secret >not so well concealed). > >I am executing the plan which I published here >and elsewhere on the Internet some weeks ago. >Serious problems have arisen as a result of the >failure by The Freedom Center to pay me for >the time, and at the rate, which I quoted to >them in writing, using email. For the record, >I have located that quotation, and I have >printed it out and put it in a safe place. >I can post that quotation here, as needed. > >While on location in Billings for 18.5 days, >I worked an average of 16 hours per day, and >invoiced them for 8 of those 16, per day. >I now have reasons to believe that my strategy >is being scuttled, by forces which are not >entirely known to me at this time. Red Beckman >has fallen totally silent, which surprises me >no end. The specter of apartheid has raised >its ugly head, because some of the Montana Freemen >are avowed white supremacists. I tried to >avoid that matter as much as possible, but >staff of The Freedom Center went out of >their way to spend my time debating the >biblical foundation for apartheid. For this >reason, and for this reason alone, I may never >return to The Freedom Center, because the >"feelings" may be mutual. For the record, >I am personally disgusted with apartheid, >and I am willing to fight to expel apartheid >from the freedom movement. What an oxymoron! > >The two "interlopers" (as I call them) >did very little but waste my time (4 days) and >basically insulted me when they handed me >an illegible, penciled brief which I could not >read and, when I finally did get their help >to decipher the illegible words, the brief had >the wrong parties, wrong court, and wrong action. >But, I was expected to be their clerical secretary >with an unacceptably poor draft of a pleading >which was mostly nonsense, in my honest opinion. >I never hand anyone else such poorly written >and poorly styled drafts; I compose at a >computer terminal, and use the Internet as >my broadcast tower. I didn't spend 25 years >in the computer industry twiddling my thumbs. >The Internet has been the vivid dream of tens of >thousands of Americans who conceived and built >the most utterly fantastic noosphere ever >witnessed by planet earth. So, tell me I >don't know what I am doing. I am all ears. > >You might want to ask Randy Parsons to relate >what happened after that. One of the interlopers >almost fell down the stairwell, he was backing >up so fast. One more step backwards, and he >would have found himself in the basement. This >man also claimed to have contacts with the >Queen of England, and was just "days" away from >having this huge account in Europe which we could >utilize to fund the litigation. Still waiting, >D & C! You know who you are. Have you read >Title 28 yet? Trojan Horse, these two. > >It is encouraging that some courts are now ruling >that commercial liens cannot be perfected without >the debtor's signature. If that holding prevails, >they will have, unwittingly, destroyed each and >every single Notice of Federal Tax Lien ever filed >with a county recorder, anywhere in America, because >I know for a fact that the IRS does not bother >getting "debtors" to sign those bogus Notices. > >The question of commercial lien validity is a >perfectly good issue to litigate thoroughly, and >that is one of the issues we plan to litigate in >People v. United States. I think that America has >failed to grasp just how much power is available to >such a 3-judge panel. For example, they would have >the power to dissolve all Notices of Federal Tax Lien >on the strength of this one question: does the >debtor need to sign it? Also, such a 3-judge panel >can hear bankruptcy matters; the People could declare >voluntary bankruptcy, and force the IMF to file a >"Proof of Claim" form for ALL of their claim(s) >against the American People. Are we, quite possibly, >looking at a Jubilee Year now, for the first time >in American history? Now, wouldn't that be music >to our ears? > >I can easily offset the IMF claim with >proof that thousands of Americans have been placed >in prison by courts which never had any criminal >jurisdiction whatsoever; these are torts for >unlawful imprisonment which carry very heavy damages. >I have one client who, as a federal witness, experienced >200 separate events of retaliation; @ $250,000 per >event, the United States owes him $50 million, not >counting all the other criminal violations which have >been committed against him and his family since the >year 1982. > >The DCUS has the POWER to hear all these >matters, and accordingly, it has the POWER to issue >relief on all these matters. Whether LeRoy Michael >Schweitzer wants to remove all his actions into the >same court is up to him; he is still a Freeman, >even in chains. The court is there; it has always >been there. It is now time that we dust off judicial >power and start to energize it. The only way to do >that is to take control of the action by filing as >Plaintiffs. This, We the People, have already done. >I invite you to join us. The effort is not fruitless, >as so many are now implying. It does become very >difficult when people don't pay you for a job well >done. "A man is worthy of his hire," I seem to have >read in several disk files produced by Mr. Schweitzer. > >I rest for now. I am very tired, particularly from >expending all the energy that was required to surround >the Centers for Disease Control with a spiritual force >field, for their complicity in the Gulf War Illnesses. >My batteries just need a little re-charging. People >are falling by the wayside like flies; the Holy Spirit >is actually in charge here, and many "persons" don't >know that, and never will. > >Amen. > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail