Time: Thu Nov 07 14:55:11 1996 To: Scott <sge@ultranet.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: People v. United States Cc: Bcc: >Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 08:48:45 >To: joseph.d.robertson@nhmccd.cc.tx.us >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: People v. United States > >>Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 06:31:27 >>To: Liberty Law >>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>Subject: People v. United States >> >>Dear America, >> >>Lest we forget: People v. United States et al. >>was filed in Garfield county court to obtain >>a TRO against the FBI to restrain them from >>using lethal force against the Montana Freemen, >>and to enjoin the United States from depriving >>anyone of life, liberty, or property without >>due process of law. After some skirmishing, >>Judge Kenneth Wilson has permitted the removal >>of said case into federal court, but he erred >>by ordering removal into the United States >>District Court (USDC). This is not only the wrong court, >>but he had no motion before him to authorize >>removal; that motion is before the DCUS, which >>is awaiting the assignment of a 3-judge panel >>before it can issue any relief whatsoever >>(no judge, no relief). >> >>The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has been >>served with a formal Notice and Demand to >>prepare a certificate of necessity for Rehnquist >>to locate and assign 3 competent and qualified >>judges, whose compensations are not being diminished >>by federal income taxes. When we find just one, >>it will send a shock wave through Wall Street, >>the likes of which they have never seen. Rehnquist >>is smiling, because he knows our last move was >>a "fork" in chess: they lose either way on this >>round. We are playing serious chess here, in >>case you haven't noticed. >> >>My mail is not being forwarded from >>The Freedom Center, so I have not received >>any communications from the DCUS to date, other >>than a conformed copy of the original Petition >>for Warrant of Removal. I have requested the >>assistance of the Postmaster in Billings, >>in writing. I am also communicating in >>writing with other officials in Montana. >> >>Things are moving very VERY slowly, too >>slowly for my liking. The esssay "Karma and >>the Federal Courts" has hit the streets, and >>it has lots of people hopping mad: U.S. >>incarceration rate 2x that of South Africa, >>which is second in the world in prisoners >>per capita. "The Kick-Back Racket" is making >>people even more angry. The United States is >>in a terrible legal situation at present, >>and they know it. A vacuum is forming, and >>lots of strange things happen in a strong >>vacuum. >> >>I am trying to keep the channels >>of communication open to the Ninth Circuit >>(Judge Alex Kozinski in Pasadena) and to the >>Supreme Court (Rehnquist gets courtesy copies >>of all important documents). Judging from the >>way I was treated when I discovered that >>Elizabeth Broderick had rubber-stamped her >>liens with a bogus court, it would not surprise >>me if the "powers that be" have decreed that I >>will not be allowed to succeed with People >>v. United States either. >> >>The Supremes' decision to punt in the >>face of a challenge by 16 federal judges >>to more SSA taxes, was very revealing. >>The issue of judicial compensation is hotter than >>a freshly baked potato at present; it will be >>their undoing, because of cases like Lord v. >>Kelley (I have been misspelling "Kelley" as "Kelly") >>and, more importantly, Evans v. Gore (the pivotal >>holding). Don't forget, we have newly found >>evidence, namely, People v. Boxer, which makes >>Evans even stronger, because there is no >>16th Amendment; it is res judicata (a secret >>not so well concealed). >> >>I am executing the plan which I published here >>and elsewhere on the Internet some weeks ago. >>Serious problems have arisen as a result of the >>failure by The Freedom Center to pay me for >>the time, and at the rate, which I quoted to >>them in writing, using email. For the record, >>I have located that quotation, and I have >>printed it out and put it in a safe place. >>I can post that quotation here, as needed. >> >>While on location in Billings for 18.5 days, >>I worked an average of 16 hours per day, and >>invoiced them for 8 of those 16, per day. >>I now have reasons to believe that my strategy >>is being scuttled, by forces which are not >>entirely known to me at this time. Red Beckman >>has fallen totally silent, which surprises me >>no end. The specter of apartheid has raised >>its ugly head, because some of the Montana Freemen >>are avowed white supremacists. I tried to >>avoid that matter as much as possible, but >>staff of The Freedom Center went out of >>their way to spend my time debating the >>biblical foundation for apartheid. For this >>reason, and for this reason alone, I may never >>return to The Freedom Center, because the >>"feelings" may be mutual. For the record, >>I am personally disgusted with apartheid, >>and I am willing to fight to expel apartheid >>from the freedom movement. What an oxymoron! >> >>The two "interlopers" (as I call them) >>did very little but waste my time (4 days) and >>basically insulted me when they handed me >>an illegible, penciled brief which I could not >>read and, when I finally did get their help >>to decipher the illegible words, the brief had >>the wrong parties, wrong court, and wrong action. >>But, I was expected to be their clerical secretary >>with an unacceptably poor draft of a pleading >>which was mostly nonsense, in my honest opinion. >>I never hand anyone else such poorly written >>and poorly styled drafts; I compose at a >>computer terminal, and use the Internet as >>my broadcast tower. I didn't spend 25 years >>in the computer industry twiddling my thumbs. >>The Internet has been the vivid dream of tens of >>thousands of Americans who conceived and built >>the most utterly fantastic noosphere ever >>witnessed by planet earth. So, tell me I >>don't know what I am doing. I am all ears. >> >>You might want to ask Randy Parsons to relate >>what happened after that. One of the interlopers >>almost fell down the stairwell, he was backing >>up so fast. One more step backwards, and he >>would have found himself in the basement. This >>man also claimed to have contacts with the >>Queen of England, and was just "days" away from >>having this huge account in Europe which we could >>utilize to fund the litigation. Still waiting, >>D & C! You know who you are. Have you read >>Title 28 yet? Trojan Horse, these two. >> >>It is encouraging that some courts are now ruling >>that commercial liens cannot be perfected without >>the debtor's signature. If that holding prevails, >>they will have, unwittingly, destroyed each and >>every single Notice of Federal Tax Lien ever filed >>with a county recorder, anywhere in America, because >>I know for a fact that the IRS does not bother >>getting "debtors" to sign those bogus Notices. >> >>The question of commercial lien validity is a >>perfectly good issue to litigate thoroughly, and >>that is one of the issues we plan to litigate in >>People v. United States. I think that America has >>failed to grasp just how much power is available to >>such a 3-judge panel. For example, they would have >>the power to dissolve all Notices of Federal Tax Lien >>on the strength of this one question: does the >>debtor need to sign it? Also, such a 3-judge panel >>can hear bankruptcy matters; the People could declare >>voluntary bankruptcy, and force the IMF to file a >>"Proof of Claim" form for ALL of their claim(s) >>against the American People. Are we, quite possibly, >>looking at a Jubilee Year now, for the first time >>in American history? Now, wouldn't that be music >>to our ears? >> >>I can easily offset the IMF claim with >>proof that thousands of Americans have been placed >>in prison by courts which never had any criminal >>jurisdiction whatsoever; these are torts for >>unlawful imprisonment which carry very heavy damages. >>I have one client who, as a federal witness, experienced >>200 separate events of retaliation; @ $250,000 per >>event, the United States owes him $50 million, not >>counting all the other criminal violations which have >>been committed against him and his family since the >>year 1982. >> >>The DCUS has the POWER to hear all these >>matters, and accordingly, it has the POWER to issue >>relief on all these matters. Whether LeRoy Michael >>Schweitzer wants to remove all his actions into the >>same court is up to him; he is still a Freeman, >>even in chains. The court is there; it has always >>been there. It is now time that we dust off judicial >>power and start to energize it. The only way to do >>that is to take control of the action by filing as >>Plaintiffs. This, We the People, have already done. >>I invite you to join us. The effort is not fruitless, >>as so many are now implying. It does become very >>difficult when people don't pay you for a job well >>done. "A man is worthy of his hire," I seem to have >>read in several disk files produced by Mr. Schweitzer. >> >>I rest for now. I am very tired, particularly from >>expending all the energy that was required to surround >>the Centers for Disease Control with a spiritual force >>field, for their complicity in the Gulf War Illnesses. >>My batteries just need a little re-charging. People >>are falling by the wayside like flies; the Holy Spirit >>is actually in charge here, and many "persons" don't >>know that, and never will. >> >>Amen. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail