Time: Fri Nov 08 05:36:13 1996
To: pkawaja@dnet.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: The Kick-Back Racket
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Fri, 08 Nov 1996 05:17:06
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: The Kick-Back Racket
>
>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>
>
>For Immediate Release November 4, 1996
>
> The Kick-Back Racket:
> Performance Management and
> Recognition System
>
> by
>
> Paul Andrew Mitchell
> All Rights Reserved
> (October 1996)
>
>
> It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of
>a conspiracy of silence which has descended upon the District of
>Columbia in recent months, that President Clinton has a lot of
>explaining to do, in quite a few executive departments. One of
>the best suppressed stories of his administration thus far is
>evidence of White House kick-backs from the Internal Revenue
>Service ("IRS") for each and every indictment issued by federal
>grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are.
>
> The term itself is an oxymoron, because protest has never
>been illegal in America. Protest is even recognized by the
>federal government's precious Uniform Commercial Code for
>repudiating presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the phrase
>"illegal tax protestor" to withstand the obvious constitutional
>challenge (yes, the First Amendment is still the supreme Law in
>America), the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax."
>This is a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress
>of what many Americans have known for a long time, namely, the
>federal income tax is a total and utter fraud, from stem to
>stern. Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with
>loop-holes and sinking fast.
>
> What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which
>the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak
>the truth. A key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM")
>clearly shows that the President routinely receives $35,000 from
>the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). We
>have a political prisoner in federal custody right now who is
>prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and
>every time a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any
>illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys receive a mere
>$25,000 per indictment of ITP's.
>
> Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task
>force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the
>former Pilot Connection Society which has been reported to have
>over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if
>his hench-persons in the DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury
>indictments against all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000
>equals $175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is that
>the IRM provides absolutely no authority for these "performance
>recognition rewards" (read "kick-backs"). Courts have
>consistently ruled that the IRM has no more authority than a
>pizza recipe, when it comes to authorizing salaries and other
>
>
> The Kick-Back Racket: Page 1 of 3
>
>compensation for federal government employees. Federal employee
>salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a
>far cry from that high standard of law.
>
> Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President from
>receiving any other "emoluments" during his term of office. See
>Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within
>that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of
>them." A FOIA request by this author for all PMRS records
>produced an admission, on Treasury Department letterhead, that
>some records do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash.
>This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs with
>the perjury racket now rampant within the Department of Just US,
>and with a grand jury system which badly needs either complete
>overhaul or abolition, you quickly find that the indictments
>issuing from federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the
>Internal Revenue Code, are really threats, engineered by the
>biggest extortion racket this planet has ever seen. Jury
>tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do
>a far better job of describing what is really going on.
>
> In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena for
>certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona conspired
>with the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of
>mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction
>of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the
>above. When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to
>investigate probable violations of federal law by the AUSA, the
>judge intercepted this certified request, and all subsequent
>pleadings which were then directed to the grand jury by Counsel
>in order to keep them informed of what was really going on.
>These pleadings contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it --
>of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of pathological
>lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for
>repeatedly lying to a federal court in Phoenix. This was
>unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own.
>
> Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming that
>the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries,
>both grand and trial, is horribly defective for exhibiting
>obvious class bias against state Citizens who are not also
>federal citizens. The courts have consistently ruled that
>Americans can be state Citizens without also being federal
>citizens, whether or not the federal government's precious
>Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted (and we
>now know that it was not). Unfortunately for Congress, this
>class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title
>28 United States Code Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each
>and every federal grand jury indictment, and each and every
>federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.
>
> The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so
>many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely no lawful
>authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that with the fact that
>the U.S. incarceration rate is twice as high as it is in South
>Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita.
>
>
>
> The Kick-Back Racket: Page 2 of 3
>
> Do you think maybe that the federal government may be
>running an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so. I
>know so. I can prove it. I am appalled.
>
>
>Common Law Copyright
>Paul Andrew Mitchell
>Counselor at Law, federal witness
>and Citizen of Arizona state
>All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
>November 4, 1996
>
>
> # # #
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The Kick-Back Racket: Page 3 of 3
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail