Time: Fri Nov 08 12:47:11 1996
To: minutemn@pcl.net (Mike Kemp)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Help me, please?
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Dear Mike,

I can help you, in a very big way.
But, you must agree to read and study
everything which I give to you,
so that you can sign and file the
briefs with knowledge and confidence
of the overall strategy.  You must
also agree to find some money for
this effort.  I cannot work pro bono
or on contingency.  I charge $75 per
hour against a $500 earnest retainer,
paid in advance with cash or blank
U.S. Postal Money Orders.  I have had
two clients stiff me for over $10,000
each, one for $3,100, another for
$2,000, and one for $1,250, all for
believing some vicious lies that I am 
some kind of deep cover government
agent.  If you choose to fall for
this lie, then I will drop you like
a hot potato.  The lies are being used
to scuttle the very important work
which I and my colleagues in the
Supreme Law Firm are now doing.  So,
I need your agreement to scrape 
together the retainer, after which
we will go to work.  Otherwise, I am
required by the laws of economics to
move onto other priorities.  Thanks,
Mike.  Cheer up;  now the fun really
begins.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 01:15 PM 11/8/96 -0800, you wrote:
>Paul:
>	THERE! I said it.
>	Paul, I am a very weird duck. I am a loner from day one. Until I 
>started school, I was raised in the absence of other children. With no 
>companions, adults only for company, partially paralyzed and sickly, I 
>was a cave-dwelling hermit by age 5. I had pounded into my head *do unto 
>others as you would have them do unto you,* and I expend an enormous 
>amount of energy, by request as well as from internal motivation, doing 
>just that.
>	Long and short of it, I never learned to seek help, nor how. It 
>has always been Mike against whatever confronted him, win lose or draw. 
>On anything approaching a level field, I have done quite well. In the 
>law, and particularly since I haven't committed any criminal act, I am at 
>a loss on what to do. How does one present a defense against a charge of 
>tending a garden, alone, on your own property?
>	All I know how to do is stand up and tell the truth, and assert 
>my rights. What is wrong with juries, Paul? Can they not see that I was 
>targeted and assaulted because I dared to speak out? Can they not see 
>that today Mike Kemp is going to jail, but that tomorrow it will be their 
>sons, their neighbors, their selves in the dock? Since I don't trust 
>lawyers, with even the best of them hamstrung by the bar association 
>whore in black robes, and don't have the money (having already lost tens 
>of thousands of irreplaceable dollars to lawyers) for a truly competent 
>one..?? For that matter, I don't even have the money for a cheap 
>incompetent one.
>	Help me, Paul, if you will. Please. I need help, I don't trust 
>licensed lawyers, my own assertions fall on amused, deaf ears. I knew 
>going in, years ago, that I was going to face prison. Actually, I was 
>lucky, for they intended to kill me the day I was busted. Only the 
>stupidity of the police in bringing the media and my unexpectedly 
>appearing unarmed was all that saved me.
>	If that is the Lord's plan, so be it. I don't like it, but I- 
>accept?- not really, but that word will do for now. I would lay down my 
>life happily, if I could know that I would serve the function that the 
>dead, unlicensed preacher served for Patrick Henry. What I don't want to 
>happen is to be part of the day's trash.
>	A month ago I met a retired Sar-Major, a decorated hero of 'Nam 
>and Desert Storm. He was called back to the Army for Desert Storm a year 
>after he retired the first time. In that interim, he was a deputy sheriff 
>here.
>	I met him at the eye doctor's where I had taken my grandmother. 
>His wife, a diabetic, was there. He has no problem with cannabis, and his 
>wife has glaucoma and is taking THC on prescription. He bitched about 
>how the government just lets a very few have the *real stuff.* I thought 
>that the Lord had provided, as he has so often done in the last few 
>years. I contacted him, *asking* that he testify. Just about the medical 
>aspects, or to speak to his wife about it. He wouldn't even consider 
>helping. *Don't want to get involved in any court thing.* That is the 
>other reason that I don't ask. What few times I do, I am generally 
>rebuffed, and made to feel like a shit for asking.
>	Don't get me wrong- this man owed me nothing. He has served his 
>country well, and deserves to live out his life without the hassles which 
>would invariably fall on him.
>	But- he can't see that the internal corruption of our nation is 
>far more threat than Ho Chi Minh or Saddam Hussein could ever be, and 
>will result in, if not his destruction, at least the destruction of his 
>children's and grandchildren's lives.
>	Help me, please?
>
>In Liberty,
>
>Mike Kemp
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail