Time: Sat Nov 09 13:48:06 1996
To: snetnews@alterzone.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Baby-Killing Vaccine
Cc:
Bcc:
FYI, Jeffrey Thayer and Richard McDonald
made a videotape some years ago, in
which they discussed evidence that the
U.S. Court of Claims had updated their
local rules to reflect a ton of new court
rules to handle the anticipated surge in
wrongful death claims due to a "planned"
innoculation program. Does anybody have
anything more on these rules?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 01:49 AM 11/9/96 -0600, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's snetnews Mailing List
>
>From: dsale@users.southeast.net (Danny Sale)
>Subject: Baby-Killing Vaccine being tested(fwd)
>Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 06:57:16 GMT
>
>
>Baby-killing vaccine: Is it being stealth tested?
>by James A. Miller
>
>During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been overseeing
>massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among
>them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a
>communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comit Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding
>that country's anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign
>protocols, the Comit obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them
>analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic
>gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a
>pregnancy.
>
>hCG and anti-hCG antibodies.
>
>In nature the hCG hormone alerts the women's body that she is pregnant and
>causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the
>implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after
>conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a
>woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but
>for the elevated presence of hCG. However, when introduced into the body
>coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only
>against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize
>hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. These antibodies will
>attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a
>pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is
>rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.1
>
> HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its
>World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.2 Soon additional
>reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the
>Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar
>reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in
>1993.
>
>The known facts here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination
>campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:
>
>Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45.
>(In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49). But aren't men at least as likely as
>young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why
>are they excluded?
>
> Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It
>does not belong there -- in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the
>vaccine has been "contaminated."
>
>The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections -- three within three
>months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide
>protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?
>
>WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an
>anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier -- the
>exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua
>vaccines.
>
>The anti-fertility gang
>
>Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using
>hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development
>Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller
>Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of
>universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State.5 The U.S. National
>Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier
>of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.6 The WHO began its "Special
>Programme" in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356
>million on "reproductive health" research.7 It is this "Programme" which has
>pioneered the development of the abortifacient vaccine. Over $9 million of this
>Programme's funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than
>$52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million,
>$27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of
>such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed "only"
>$5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of
>$2.5 million.
>
> Other major contributors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the
>World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford
>Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development
>Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand.
>
>WHO and Philippine Health Department excuses
>
>When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine
>being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health
>(DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the
>results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four
>vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence
>coming from "right-to-life and Catholic" sources. Four new vials of the tetanus
>vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke's (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila
>-- and all four vials tested positive for hCG! From outright denial the stories
>now shifted to the allegedly "insignificant" quantity of the hCG present; the
>volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies. But new
>tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of
>women vaccinated with the tetanus toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine
>pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving
>tetanus toxoid vaccine, 26 tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG
>antibodies! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only
>"insignificant" quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring
>anti-hCG antibodies?
>
> The WHO and the DOH had no answers. New arguments surfaced: hCG's apparent
>presence in the vaccine was due to "false positives" resulting from the
>particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG.
>And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing
>process. But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated
>women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer
>necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG
>presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the
>vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been
>artificially introduced into their bodies!
>
>Why a tetanus toxoid "carrier"?
>
>Because the human body does not attack its own naturally occurring hormone hCG,
>the body has to be fooled into treating hCG as an invading enemy in order to
>develop a successful anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG antibodies. A paper
>delivered at the 4th International Congress of Reproductive Immunology (Kiel,
>West Germany, 26-29 July 1989) spelled it out: "Linkage to a carrier was done
>to overcome the immunological tolerance to hCG."
>
>Vaccine untested by Drug Bureau
>
>After the vaccine controversy had reached a fever pitch, a new bombshell
>exploded: none of the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used had
>ever been licensed for sale and distribution or registered with the Philippine
>Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), as required bylaw. The head of the BAFD lamely
>explained that the companies distributing these brands "did not apply for
>registration."9 The companies in question are Connaught Laboratories Ltd. And
>Intervex, both from Canada, and CSL Laboratories from Australia. It seemed that
>the BAFD might belatedly require re-testing, but the idea was quickly rejected
>when the Secretary of Health declared that, since the vaccines had been
>certified by the WHO -- there they are again! -- there was assurance enough
>that the "vaccines come from reputable manufacturers."10 Just how "reputable"
>one of the manufacturers might be is open to some question. In the mid-'80s
>Connaught Laboratories was found to be knowingly distributing vials of
>AIDS-contaminated blood products.
>
>Epilogue
>
>At this juncture, evidence is beginning to appear from Africa.12 HLI has called
>for a Congressional investigation of the situation, inasmuch as nearly every
>agency involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine is funded, at
>least in part, with U.S. monies.
>
>Notes
>
>1 "Abortifacient vaccines loom as new threat," HLI Reports, November
>1993,pp.1-2.
>
>2 World Council Reports, 28 November 1994, pp. 4-5.
>
>3 A call placed by this writer on 5 May 1995 to the Montgomery County (Maryland)
>Health Department, Epidemiology Division Infectious Diseases Adult Immunizations,
>elicited the following information: Q. For how long a time does the tetanus
>vaccination offer protection? A. 10 years. Q. Have you ever heard of any adult
>requiring three tetanus vaccinations within a 3 or 4 month time period, and a
>total of 5 vaccinations in all within a year or so? A. Whaaaat! Never. No way!
>Reports from the Philippines appear to confirm the 10-year immunity afforded by
>tetanus toxoid vaccinations: prior to the campaigns begun in 1993, the so-called
>booster shots were given only every 10-years.
>
>4 More than a score of articles, many written by WHO researchers, document
>WHO's attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as
>a carrier. Some leading articles include:"Clinical profile and Toxicology
>Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,"Contraception, February,
>1976, pp. 253-268."Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a
>candidate antipregnancy vaccine: --subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin
>linked to tetanus toxoid," Fertility and Sterility,October 1980, pp.
>328-335."Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organization Birth Control
>Vaccine," The Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298."Vaccines for Fertility
>Regulation," Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction,
>Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and
>Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988)."Anti-hCG Vaccines
>are in Clinical Trials," Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36,1992,
>pp. 123-126.
>
>5 These institutional names are garnered from the journal articles cited in the
>previous footnote.6 Lancet, 11 June 1988, at p. 1296. Challenges in Reproductive
>Health Research, Biennial Report 1992-1993, World Health Organization, Geneva,
>1994, p. 186. G.P. Talwar, et al, "Prospects of an anti-hCG vaccine inducing
>antibodies of high affinity...(etc)," Reproductive Technology 1989, Elsevier
>Science Publishers, 1990, Amsterdam, New York, p. 231. "3 DOH vaccines untested
>by BFAD," The Philippine Star, 4 April 1995, pp. 1, 12 10 "BFAD junks re-testing
>of controversial shot," Manila Standard, 7 April 1995; "DOH: Toxoid vaccines are
>safe," The Philippine Star, 7 April 1995. 11 "Ottawa got blood tainted by HIV."
>Ottawa Citizen, 4 April 1995.12 A nearly two-year old communique from Tanzania
>tells a familiar story: tetanus toxoid vaccinations, five in all, given only to
>women aged 15-45. Nigeria, too, may have been victimized; see The Lancet, 4 June
>1988, p. 1273.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@alterzone.com
>-> Posted by: rlawler@dfw.net (Rick Lawler)
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail