Time: Sat Nov 09 15:20:58 1996 To: tab@hollyent.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: numbers Cc: Bcc: What was the voter turnout? Maybe those who didn't show are really with us, but too bitter and/or jaded to bother any longer. Then, of course, there is the problem of Vote Scam. Maybe the numbers are a total lie. It wouldn't be the first time. What bothers me no end is that I attempted to raise this question in a few Libertarian email lists, and I got shouted out by a pack of wolves. Maybe they are heavily infiltrated too. It wouldn't be the first time, or the last. /s/ Paul Mitchell >>I must agree with Bob Knauer -- the libertarian vote total needs a really >>honest examination by the LP -- and all of the third parties need to do the >>same. >> >>All signs pointed to a hugh defection from the D&R -- seldom have BOTH >>candidates been so rejected, yet the third party totals were miserable. >> >>Perhaps we are strangers in our own land? >> >>Regards, >> Frank T. Brady > >I'll ask around. >Doc >> >> >> >>>>>Browne didn't even get as many votes as Nader??? Ralph Nader??? >>>>>Good Grief! It's hopeless. >> >>>>No...it's name recognition. >> >> >>>Whatever - I am really surprised that Browne did so poorly. From all I was >>>led to believe by the 20 or so Libertarian Party members on the Internet >>>(which I now suspect comprise the entire LP membership), Browne was going to >>>get at least 25% of the vote. Remember? >>> >>>Something is seriously wrong with the LP if Nader can out draw its candidate. >>> >>>At least the LP vote did not re-elect klintoon as I had feared - those few >>>votes for Browne were lost in the rounding error for the other two candidates. >>> >>>It was Perot who re-elected klintoon, again. >>> >>>When the JBGTs come to take your guns from you, recall this sad day in >>>American history. >>> >>>Bob Knauer >>> >>>-- >>> >>>************************************************** >>> A I M N E T Advanced Internet Marketing >>> Corporation World Wide Web Publishing >>> >>> <websales@aimtec.com> http://www.aimtec.com/ >>>************************************************** >>> >>> >>> >>>======================================================================== >>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com >>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >>>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems? >>> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >>>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com >>>======================================================================== >>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>======================================================================== >>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com >>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems? >> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >>For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com >>======================================================================== >>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com >> >> >> >> > > > >======================================================================== >To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com >with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems? > email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >For information about this system and its lists email: info@hollyent.com >======================================================================== >via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail