Time: Sun Nov 10 05:42:04 1996 To: jeffrandall@juno.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: STUNG Cc: Bcc: Dear Jeff, You tell 'em, man. /s/ Paul Mitchell At 09:13 PM 11/9/96 -0700, you wrote: >--- Forwarded mail from jeffrandall@juno.com (jeff s randall) > >To: jon.roland@the-spa.com, lindat@iquest.net >Subject: Re: STUNG >From: jeffrandall@juno.com (jeff s randall) >Date: Sat, 09 Nov 1996 18:54:55 EST > >To Jon Roland, Linda Thompson and every other internet warrior that >hasn't done a Goddamned thing except bitch: > >Last damn thing the Starr family needs is a bunch of Goddamned Monday >morning quarterbacks. It seems to me everyone criticizing the way this >case was handled is the very sons-of-bitches that didn't show up or do >anything to help the families. It's about like elections, if you don't >vote, then don't bitch! Yeah, there were mistakes made, and everyone has >accepted that responsibility. > >This fucking patriot movement is only good for those who want to wage >war on the internet, and tell everyone else what they should have done. >You assholes didn't have to look the Starr family in their eyes, and >help them make decisions on whether you cut deals or take your chances. > >Except for a few (and ya'll know who you are) this whole Goddamned >patriot movement can go straight to hell, because I trust the damn feds >more than I trust you bunch of assholes. Bob Starr is one hell of a >patriot that does not blame his predicament on anyone that tried to >help, and if any of you wish to blame or criticize Bob's incarceration >on Nancy, JJ or anyone else associated with this case, then let me know >where you would like to meet, because I want you to tell me face to face >(if you have the guts), otherwise shut your fucking mouth. Bob Starr, >Jimmy McCranie, Troy Spain and their associated families are the ONLY >ones that have the right to bitch about those who tried to help them... >not you Monday morning quarterbacks. Ya'll are pitiful... pointing >fingers after the fact, instead of getting involved during the >situation. > >If these men would have been acquitted, then all of you would have been >praising the whole damn team.... bunch of damn fair weather friends and >sunshine patriots... like I said .... Rot in Hell. > >To all of you who supported this case and family and didn't bitch unless >you got involved, then please accept my appreciation and thanks. To >Linda Thompson: Go to Hell, you have stooped to a new low trying to >capitalize off of the Starr, McCranie and Spain families hardships, >anyone who would use innocent people's hardships to wage war against >those they don't like is a sorry piece of shit. I expected as much from >a 2 bit self-centered attorney such as yourself. To Jon Roland, you >should know better, but then again, maybe you don't. Linda, you're right >about me in one respect, if this is what the militia and patriot >movement is all about, then by God I'm not part of it, and hope the >whole Goddamned movement falls on its ass. Screw you bunch of >self-centered egotistical wannabes. The only battle you folks ever do is >with your computer, you've yet to put your ass on the line for anyone. >Again, go to Hell!! You got a problem with that? then, like I said, name >your damn meeting place. > >Jeff Randall > > >On Sat, 9 Nov 1996 01:13:58 -0700 "Jon Roland" <jon.roland@the-spa.com> >writes: >>Linda makes some interesting points and raises some important >>questions >>about the adequacy of the defense in this case, whether due to intent >>or >>merely incompetence. It serves to emphasize the need for more good >>patriot attorneys to cover every part of the country. >> >>We also need more information about some of the other cases than we >>have >>been getting: W. Virginia, Washington, NH/CT, etc. > >---End of forwarded mail from jeffrandall@juno.com (jeff s randall) > >Forwarding Linda Thompson's message does not mean I agreed with it, only >that it contained some useful points. Jeff's message also contains some >useful points, and I will also be forwarding it to the same recipients, >together with my comments. > >First, we all all angry about the result, but we need to cool off and >think about it, and learn from it. This is not just about the victims in >Macon. We've just lost a game, but we've got another one coming up, and >more after that. We need to discuss among ourselves exactly what >happened, who did what, where, when, how, and why, what worked and what >didn't, and how we can do better next time. > >And just because some of us weren't on the scene for this game doesn't >mean we don't have a right to question or comment, because each of us is >likely to have a game of his own to play on his home field soon. We have >an adversary who tends to follow a somewhat unimaginative, but fairly >consistent, strategy, one that we can learn to defeat. It is much the >same strategy it has played throughout the country's history, against >other movements. Each of them lost, learned, and some of them went on >the win the playoffs. It is a test we all have to go through to prove >the worthiness of our causes. Today we have the advantage of more rapid >and effective information-sharing. Let's take advantage of that and turn >those losses into victories sooner than other movements in the past. > >We need to begin by compiling and sharing the documentation in the case. >Remember, during the Randy Weaver trial we got daily transcripts of the >trial proceedings. We need those now, together with copies of all the >pleadings, information on the jury panel, notes on voir dire >proceedings, descriptions of the evidence presented, and briefs from any >attorneys involved, including Thompson, Lord, and Buafo, on errors in >the case and grounds for appeal. Next we need to consult with any >attorneys who can volunteer to advise us on points in this case, and >perhaps find a good one to handle an appeal. We need to share this >material with attorneys representing others currently under attack, >whether they be in Arizona, Washington, West Virginia, Colorado, or >wherever, and get their comments. If any of them appear to be about to >make any mistakes that have been made in the past, or that we can >foresee, then we need to point that out to them, and help them do better >or find someone who can. > >The best way to handle anger is to get to work to prevent the cause of >that anger from happening again. Everyone has something to contribute to >that. Let's do it. > >--Jon > >-- >======================================================================= >Constitution Society, 1731 Howe Av #370, Sacramento, CA 95825 >916-450-7941 http://www.constitution.org/ mailto:jon.roland@the-spa.com >======================================================================= > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail