Time: Mon Nov 11 22:16:35 1996
To: jmork@waonline.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: Paul Andrew's Petition
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 10:21 AM 11/11/96 -0500, you wrote:
>I can only speak for myself, but I'll never muck up the attempt to end
>the drug war atrocity by linking it to some broad conspiracy theory
>attacking several unrelated federal agencies.

If you think that was my motivation
for posting what I did, I must say
that you are mistaken.

  Imagine trying to end
>Viet Nam through an attack on the IRS. 

Did you mean the Viet Nam war?

Let me ask you something, if I may:

How much money does it take
to field 500,000 soldiers?

And where do governments usually
get the money they need to do so?

And for whom does the IRS actually
collect money?

Answers:  lots/banks/banks

See the Grace Commission Report
for proof.

Those very same banks have simply
switched from chattel slavery,
to a new kind of statutory slavery.
U.S. debt went from $1 billion before
WWI, to $25 billion the year of the
armistice.  And that was right after
the Federal Reserve Act was enacted
into law.  I do not believe that
was some kind of grand historical
coincidence. 

/s/ Paul Mitchell


 You might THINK that would
>broaden the coalition against the war, but I think that's politically
>naive.

See John Coleman's book
entitled "The Committee of 300".

  It would simply make the government more stubborn about the
>war.

You treat the drug war
and the IRS as different
and separate.  That "theory"
assumes facts not in evidence.

/s/ Paul Mitchell


  When Roosevelt swept into power and ended prohibition, he could do
>that fairly easily because the voter opposition was very weak. 
>Prohibition was running on inertia.

Objection.  Prohibition was motivated 
by the same oil cartel which wants
marijuana outlawed, because it and
hemp-derivatives would put a noticeable
"dent" in their monopolies for oil,
lubricants, and synthetic fabrics,
not to mention the 10,000 other 
products which are derived from hemp.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

 But he NEEDED the income tax in
>order to address the critical issue of his election, the economy.

Saying this was "the critical issue"
of his election is to make a value
judgment which I cannot and do not
share with you.  I fail to see how
a government can long survive when
its people are being systematically
robbed of something like 30% of their
earnings yearly, and those enormous
amounts are being laundered through
a phony trust in Puerto Rico, for
the benefit of foreign banks, now
situated in Europe, for the most part.
We are dealing here with a massive
extortion racket, sponsored by foreign
banks and their owners, who are the
same interests which monopolize oil
and narcotics imports into America.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

  Now
>with a $100 billion deficit, there's hardly anyone in power who is ready
>to shut off the revenue spigot.

Tax. Tax. Tax.
Spend. Spend. Spend.
Elect. Elect. Elect.
It's a whirlpool.


>
>Isolate the issue of the drug war. That's the only way to fight it.

Do you mean to imply that the
American People will recoil from
the truth about the drug war?

How shall we avoid the Gulf War
Syndrome, when it comes time to
deal with a pandemic sponsored
by the same interests who are
warring on America?  Isn't there
a pattern here?  I will not be
satisfied with the bird seed
they throw out to keep us coming
back to the "feasible" and the
"probable" and the "politically
correct" initiatives and referenda.
I say it's time to compel the IMF
to prove its claims against America;
then America can put on the table
its claims against the IMF and its
owners.  Then, turn on the soap and
water, full blast, because we are
going to wash, wash, wash.  The
Belgian Firemen of Liege are just
one step ahead of us!

/s/ Paul Mitchell

 In
>fact, medical marijuana activists have gone even further to isolate
>marijuana from crack and heroin, knowing that those are harder
>fortresses to take on.

We will be a whole lot better off
as a nation, and in a much better
position to control our own destiny,
if and when we stop the annual 
hemmorage of capital, 30% or more, 
into the bands of foreign banks
and their cronies.  Just how many
schools does it take to build a
Kama River factory?  I say 1,000.

/s/ Paul Mitchell 
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail