Time: Mon Nov 11 22:30:23 1996 To: <drctalk@drcnet.org> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Paul Andrew's Petition Cc: Bcc: At 10:21 AM 11/11/96 -0500, you wrote: >I can only speak for myself, but I'll never muck up the attempt to end >the drug war atrocity by linking it to some broad conspiracy theory >attacking several unrelated federal agencies. If you think that was my motivation for posting what I did, I must say that you are mistaken. But, you are right, you did say you were speaking only for yourself. Imagine trying to end >Viet Nam through an attack on the IRS. Did you mean the Viet Nam war? Let me ask you something, if I may: How much money does it take to field 500,000 soldiers? And where do governments usually get the money they need to do so? And for whom does the IRS actually collect money? Answers: lots/banks/banks See the Grace Commission Report for proof. Those very same banks have simply switched from chattel slavery, to a new kind of statutory slavery. U.S. debt went from $1 billion before WWI, to $25 billion the year of the armistice. And that was right after the Federal Reserve Act was enacted into law. I do not believe that was some kind of grand historical coincidence. /s/ Paul Mitchell You might THINK that would >broaden the coalition against the war, but I think that's politically >naive. See John Coleman's book entitled "The Committee of 300". The war on drugs is doubly motivated: monopolize the market, to raise the price. This is called the Iron Clad Law of Prohibition. Secondly, use the Prohibition as an excuse to maintain an unnecessarily large domestic police force, to assist the extortion racket (read "tax collectors"). So, you have BATF backing IRS, and you have the military backing BATF. It's the "onion strategy": layer upon layer of force and fraud. When things begin to unravel for the racket, they up the ante: first, Weaver's son and wife; then Koresh and his followers; then the OKC federal building, and all the children therein; now, TWA 800. When you have lost the moral high ground, and you have abandoned the rule of law, you are left with only gun power, lots of it. The kind is wearing no clothes. It would simply make the government more stubborn about the >war. You treat the drug war and the IRS as different and separate. That "theory" assumes facts not in evidence. They are one and the same, for all intents and purposes. Why do you think the IRS is being used to invade health food stores? Can they have some secret hoarde of cash and other assets hiding somewhere inside those vitamin bottles? Get real. IRS agents have been heard to say, as they stripped a doctor's office of alternative remedies, "This is not about taxes." Okay, does IRS care to tell us, then? Answer: "No." /s/ Paul Mitchell When Roosevelt swept into power and ended prohibition, he could do >that fairly easily because the voter opposition was very weak. ... and the oil cartel had perfected their monopoly for automotive fuels, so Prohibition was no longer politically expedient for that cartel. >Prohibition was running on inertia. Objection. Prohibition was motivated by the same oil cartel which wants marijuana outlawed, because it, and hemp-derivatives, would put a noticeable "dent" in their monopolies for oil, lubricants, and synthetic fabrics, not to mention the 10,000 other products which are derived from hemp and which render oil unnecessary and too capital-intensive. /s/ Paul Mitchell But he NEEDED the income tax in >order to address the critical issue of his election, the economy. Saying this was "the critical issue" of his election is to make a value judgment which I cannot and do not share with you. I fail to see how a government can long survive when its people are being systematically robbed of something like 30% of their earnings yearly, and those enormous amounts are being laundered through a phony trust in Puerto Rico, for the benefit of foreign banks, now situated in Europe, for the most part. We are dealing here with a massive extortion racket, sponsored by foreign banks and their owners, who are the same interests which monopolize oil and narcotics imports into America. /s/ Paul Mitchell Now >with a $100 billion deficit, there's hardly anyone in power who is ready >to shut off the revenue spigot. Tax. Tax. Tax. Spend. Spend. Spend. Elect. Elect. Elect. It's a whirlpool. The banks are "earning" liens on American collateral by purchasing bonds which they buy with credit they create out of thin air, and/or with Federal Reserve Notes which they print for about 2.3 cents per note, regardless of denomination. FRB then obtains a lien on collateral equal to the FACE VALUE of the FRN's which they print. Now, that's what I call leverage! Who gave them that "privilege"? The Congress did, that's who. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >Isolate the issue of the drug war. That's the only way to fight it. Do you mean to imply that the American People will recoil from the truth about the drug war? How shall we avoid the Gulf War Syndrome, when it comes time to deal with a pandemic sponsored by the same interests who are warring on America? Isn't there a pattern here? I will not be satisfied with the bird seed they throw out to keep us coming back to the "feasible" and the "probable" and the "politically correct" initiatives and referenda. I say it's time to compel the IMF to prove its claims against America; then America can put on the table its claims against the IMF and its owners. Then, turn on the soap and water, full blast, because we are going to wash, wash, wash. The Belgian Firemen of Liege are just one step ahead of us! /s/ Paul Mitchell In >fact, medical marijuana activists have gone even further to isolate >marijuana from crack and heroin, knowing that those are harder >fortresses to take on. We will be a whole lot better off as a nation, and in a much better position to control our own destiny, if and when we stop the annual hemmorage of capital, 30% or more, into the hands of foreign banks and their cronies. Just how many schools does it take to build a Kama River factory? I say 1,000. /s/ Paul Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail