Time: Tue Nov 12 08:23:36 1996
To: Richard McDonald
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: state action v. removal
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 08:22:55
>To: minutemn@pcl.net (Mike Kemp)
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: state action v. removal
>
>At 08:44 AM 11/12/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>Paul:
>>	Gotcha.
>>Mike
>
>Mike,
>
>cool, man!  Cool!!
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>>> 
>>> At 10:35 AM 11/11/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>> >Paul:
>>> >       I hope you know that the charges against me are state. I read
>>> >your *map* and I see continuing references to the federal courts. Forgive
>>> >my ignorance and slow progress, I'm on a damnably steep hill.
>>> >
>>> >In Liberty,
>>> >Mike
>>> 
>>> Dear Mike,
>>> 
>>> Yes, I knew that.  I am bringing in
>>> Richard McDonald, who will shed a
>>> lot of light on the "State" governments
>>> for us.  I work the federal side of
>>> things, and he works mostly state court
>>> procedures.  I would like to combine
>>> our forces by removing your case into
>>> the District Court of the United States,
>>> on several de novo federal questions,
>>> where the case is likely to sit for
>>> quite some time, until we can reach
>>> an acceptable compromise with the
>>> U.S. Supreme Court over the temporary
>>> assignment of DCUS judges whose
>>> compensation is not being diminished
>>> by federal income taxes.  The Corporate
>>> States are now accommodation parties to
>>> the federal bankruptcy, which renders
>>> them political subdivisions of the
>>> District of Columbia;  there is one good
>>> federal question, in my opinion.  See the
>>> Buck Act and 31 CFR 51.2 and 52.2 for
>>> proof of these "de facto" Corporate States.
>>> 
>>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>>> 
>>> ===========================================================
>>> Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com
>>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>> ===========================================================
>>
>>
>>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail