Time: Tue Nov 12 19:25:12 1996
To: drydel@juno.com (david e rydel)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: D Rydel <"drydel@concentric.net"@concentric.net>: [Fwd: We're not paranoid enough.Will it happen here ?]
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Dear David,

I wonder if you would consider
changing your Subject line, so
it is shorter and to the point.
My email only displays the first
20 or so characters, and your
email messages always have the
same, repetitive subject line,
over and over.  I have no idea
what your message is about,
without reading it first.  This
makes it difficult for me to
prioritize the messages which
need immediate attention, from
other messages which can wait.

Thanks very much.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

At 07:10 PM 11/12/96 PST, you wrote:
>====================================================================
>
>///,        ////
>\  /,      /  >.             David E. Rydel
> \  /,   _/  /.                  *****
>  \_  /_/   /.        United States Theatre Command        
>   \__/_   <               Voice-810-391-0798         
>   /<<< \_\_                Fax-810-391-6785
>  /,)^>>_._ \             Alt.Fax-810-391-3528
>  (/   \\ /\\\           E-Mail-drydel@juno.com
>       // ````        E-Mail-drydel@concentric.net   
>======((`===========================================================
>
>--------------348E5686D97
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>	by tribune.concentric.net (8.7.5/(96/11/08 1.11))
>	id QAA02112; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:01:28 -0500 (EST)
>	[1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network]
>(8.8.2/8.8.1) with ESMTP id QAA20880; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:01:13 -0500 (EST)
>[172.16.15.13]) by nnsa.eds.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA31276;
>Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:00:42 -0500 (EST)
>	(1.37.109.14/16.2) id AA100272536; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 16:02:16
>-0500
>From: "Mark A. Smith" <wzf68w@wae.gmpt.gmeds.com>
>Subject: We're not paranoid enough.Will it happen here ?
>To: drydel@concentric.net, abean@juno.com, mrjoehill@juno.com,
>        luckyk406@aol.com, tslape@msn.com, thunderstrikes@juno.com,
>        ghenry@juno.com, ukfan1a@aol.com, drayner784@aol.com,
>dak_kol@juno.com,
>        ks4he@aol.com, larryv@elnet.com, ler@televar.com,
>tdreste@juno.com,
>        bulwark7@aol.com
>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 96 16:02:16 "EST
>Cc: newsroom@4bypass.com
>Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
>
>> > 
>> > MULTIPLE RECIPIENTS
>> > 
>> > Dear M R,
>> > 
>> >         I received this from a dear friend on the other side of the looking
>> > glass. For years we have satirized the anti-gun nuts by suggesting
>that they
>> > ban knives -- never even dreaming that this very thing would be done
>> > somewhere. A few days ago I forwarded you a news article about the
>poor lout
>> > in England whose car was searched (apparently without a warrant). He
>was
>> > found to be transporting three knives (which he used in his
>employment). As
>> > a result, he was charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced to a prison
>term.
>> > ALL WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF TRIAL BY JURY.
>> > 
>> >         All in all, I'd say he probably got what he deserved. Those who are
>> > unwilling to fight for freedom don't deserve it. And I doubt that he
>ever
>> > mumbled so much as a word of protest when Parliament imposed the
>anti-knife
>> > laws on that Nation of Geldings known as England.
>> > 
>> >         I now have a recurring nightmare of Jim Brady being wheeled out for
>> > the cameras to support his lovely wife's latest campaign KNI (Knife
>Control,
>> > Incorporated). I have seen the future, and I'm nauseous.
>> > 
>> >         Reporting from the Theater of the Absurd, I remain
>> > 
>> > Your faithful correspondent,
>> > 
>> >  -- Harvey
>> >                 ==================================
>> > >From the London Times, Nov. 9, 1996.....
>> > 
>> >          Police want tougher rules for knife shops
>> > 
>> >                          BY STEWART TENDLER
>> >                         CRIME CORRESPONDENT
>> > 
>> >        SHOPS should be banned from selling any knife apparently
>intended
>> >        as a  weapon unless they can prove it has a legitimate use
>> >        in trade or sports, senior police officers said yesterday.
>> > 
>> >        The Police Superintendents' Association suggested that a ban
>could
>> >        form part of a workable legal framework under which combat
>> >        knives could be taken off the market.
>> >        Chief Superintendent Peter Gammon, vice-president, said that
>> >        retailers who sold illegal weapons should face
>> >        fines or even imprisonment. The idea was put forward after a
>> >        meeting of a committee of operational superintendents
>> >        from around the country.
>> > 
>> >        The association said that retailers should have to prove
>> >        legitimate trade or sports use before displaying, advertising
>> >        or marketing any knife "apparently designed or made solely
>> >         to injure or wound".
>> > 
>> >        Mr Gammon also said that the Government's proposed new
>> >        stop-and-search powers, intended to be effective against
>gangs,
>> >        did not go far enough. Police wanted to be able to
>> >        search individuals they suspect of habitually carrying knives.
>> >         ****************************************************
>> >         TRIAL BY JURY PROTECTS ALL RIGHTS
>> >         ****************************************************
>> >         "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any
>> >         government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well,
>> >         when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One
>> >         declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes
>> >         impossible for men to live without breaking laws."
>> >         -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, Ch. III, "White Blackmail"
>> >         ****************************************************
>> >         Harvey Wysong
>> >         National Spokesman, Fully Informed Jury Association
>> >         701 Longleaf Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, U.S.A.
>> >         hwysong@mindspring.com        (404) 266-0930
>> >         ****************************************************
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Nation In Distress
>> http://www.involved.com/ewolfe/index2.htm
>> Free the Macon Three!
>> 
>
>
>
>--------------348E5686D97--
>
>
>
>
>--------- End forwarded message ----------
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail