Time: Tue Nov 12 21:35:36 1996
To: Electra Briggs <electra@texas.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: RHey Little Buckaroo
Cc: 
Bcc: 

Dearest Electra,

Another client decided to go
with a licensed bar member,
this after I heard this very
same client tell HIS client
that HIS client has been
screwed big time each and
every time HIS client has
retained a bar member.  The
other serious problem is that
my client has a serious alcohol
problem, which is getting serious.
I have been to his house many
times for dinner, and with alarming
frequency, he spills his drink,
or the gravy bowl, on the table cloth.
His behavior also deteriorates 
severely, since he cannot walk
straight, and his speech begins
to slur, just after he begins drinking.

On a different subject now:

Could you give some thought to helping
me raise some funds?   Since my client
is going to pay his new attorney an
up-front retainer of $10,000, after 
doing nickel and dime work with me,
I don't look forward to more work from
him.  He will need to address his alcohol
problem before I could consider giving
him more responsibility within the 
Supreme Law Firm.

So, here are two ideas:

1.  schedule the private briefing
    you mentioned, and do so asap;
    I am ready to go on a moment's
    notice;  can you print out and
    distribute the set of briefs I
    have already prepared, for study
    materials?

2.  give some thought to becoming a 
    fund raiser for the Supreme Law Firm,
    Supreme Law Seminars, and Supreme Law School.
    You, of course, would be entitled to a
    proper share of the funds raised (this is
    only fair:  what percentage would you want?)

3.  help produce videotape and audiotape 
    recordings of my presentations; 
    I briefed my friend Rich for 3 hours
    in a restaurant yesterday, and the
    waitress could not get a word in edgewise; 
    I had to apologize to her for dominating
    the conversation.

Gotta go.  Multi-front war going here.  :)

/s/ Paul Mitchell


At 10:14 PM 11/12/96 -0600, you wrote:
>Paul:
>
>I have just found the time to read all of your recent postings.
>How many fronts are you covering my little buckaroo?
>How many simultaneous conversions are you dealing with?
>I always say crisis before expansion old chum.
>
>
>It is great to see that you have the Supreme Law website up and running.
>Have you entertained the thought of creating a weekly on-line
>forum whereby, you go live, interactive chat, etc.?
>
>I'm sure you have checked out the Hotwired Netizen cite?
>Creative format. There is a new site you might want to check out.
>I'll send you the url once I relocate it.
>
>Have you thought of obtaining sponsorship for the website?
>How about if people *pay* a nominal fee, a subscription fee, 
>to obtain this remarkable information? 
>
>
>RE: Audience Response
>A word about your comment regarding your display of anger..
>Hey. As long as your attitude conveys to the audience...upfront...that 
>you, "are mad as hell and not going to take this anymore..."
>This is acceptable. This an audience will understand. Tell 'em you are
>angry..and then tell 'em why. Then, they will not feel intimidated.
>They will see the passion, the candor, the authenticity of your message, 
>and listen to you more intently.
>
>
>RE: Utterback and the Ravin'Craven:
>Bill just doesn't get it.
>
>I call people who are still sleeping, notsees. Just a bunch of
>damned notsees. Okay. Okay. I am magnanimnous....most of the time.
>Just get disgusted and mysanthropic once in a while.
>
>Has Nancy turned a deaf ear to all of the Bio stuff? I must make
>contact with her soon. 
>I tell you Paul, not everyone is cut out to deal with this sort
>of stuff. Check out the deoxy.org site. Once the first page has
>downloaded all of the images, click on the image at the upper left
>hand corner. (The sun.) Read what it says. I tend to agree with the
>authors point of view. Enough said.
>
>RE: Guilt
>
>Guilt is passe. We don't have time for guilt. Think about it.
>We do not have time to suffer a maelstrom of guilty emotions.
>
>People like us use our anger constructively. No. I did not say
>that we should sublimate. Sublimation is passe.
>
>I must go finish some work. Love ya kiddo. You are the best!
>Thanks for all the good thoughts you wend my way.
>
>As Ever,
>Electra
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail