Time: Tue Nov 12 22:57:32 1996
To: JOhm999@aol.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: Depopulation
Cc:
Bcc:
As I have said before,
they are accusing us of crimes
which they are committing.
Speak for yourself, Ted!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 12:52 AM 11/13/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear friends:
>
>Here is up-to-date news on D E P O P U L A T I O N....
>Downloaded from the Michael Reagan web page. This is especially important
>given the fact that at Gorbachev's "State of the World Forum" one of the
>scientists [sorry forgot name and don't have time to look it up.] said, "We
>don't have an environmental problem, we have a population problem. Get rid
>of 9 out of 10 people by the year 2000 and there won't be an environmental
>problem." They call us "useless eaters." Ted Turner who was one of the
>attendees at the "State of the World Forum," keeps calling the Aerican people
>"stupid" because people are unaware of what they are doing. [I can provide
>documentation on their depopulation plans.]
> MARYLOU (LULU) IN RENO
>
> "STOP THE SIGNING"
>
>Tell your congressman and the White House not to sign the silly document!
>Susan
>Roylance, of United Families International urged on the Michael Regean show
>today from the Rome World Food Summit. The document does not address
>increased food
>production for the world. It will, however, provide hundreds of millions of
>dollars to
>governments PROVIDED they agree to eliminate people.
>
>Tomorrow Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman arrives in Rome to sign, for
>the
>260,000,000 people of the United States, the Rome World Food Security and
>Plan of
>Action document. This document will become part of the United Nations' body
>of
>International law which will impact families for generations to come, Susan
>noted.
>
>This is no promotion in the document of the free enterprise method of helping
>a country grow and become able to take care of itself. The idea of the
>conference, she said, is to teach, in fact to demand by government action,
>population control instead of teaching them how to grow food effectively. The
>first three rows of delegates to the conference, she noted today, all
>introduced themselves as representatives of population control organizations
>throughout the world. Delegates who have come from all over the world to
>share their knowledge of effective food production are not only being
>ignored, they are, in effect, considered hindrances in the drive to push
>governmental, Chinese style population control, and extreme environmentalist
>viewpoints which consider modern farms, like those in America which feed the
>nation with plenty to spare, evils to be stopped.
>
>No one is promoting the system that has helped America become the breadbasket
>of the world. In fact, it is being OPPOSED here by our own government! Susan
>Roylance reported. This planet can do much more than it is doing to feed
>people. We don't need to eliminate people. We need to feed them. There are
>people here who can teach the rest of the world how to do it - and they are
>not being allowed to share their knowledge!
>
>She urges that people call the Dept. of Agriculture at 202-720-3631 to urge
>that Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman not sign the document. Also, call
>the White House at 202-456-1414 and your members of Congress to demand that
>the document not be signed until it better reflects America's values and its
>successful methods of food production.
> ----0----
>
>
> At Issue at the UN World Food Summit:
> More Food Production versus Elimination of Hungry People?
> by: Mary Mostert
>
>The twenty four page Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food
>Summit Plan of Actions that will be adopted at the UN Conference in Rome next
>week declares:
>
>Reaching sustainable world food security is part and parcel of achieving the
>social,
>economic, environmental and human development objectives agreed upon in
>recent
>international conferences.
>
>The World Food Summit Plan of Action builds on consensus reached in these
>forums and is based on the conviction that although the world is faced with
>major food insecurity, solutions to these problems exist. If all parties at
>local, national, regional and international levels make determined and
>sustained efforts, then the overall goal of food for all, at all times, will
>be achieved.
>
>No one is going to object to the goal of getting people fed. "Food
>insecurity" is a problem on our front pages daily - in Bosnia, in Rwanda, now
>in Zaire - it very often is caused by war.
>
>The first paragraph of the document states: "We, the Heads of State and
>Government, or our representatives, gathered at the World Food Summit at the
>invitation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
>reaffirm the right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food,
>consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of
>everyone to be free from hunger."
>
>In effect, those countries that sign the document are accepting the notion
>that a full
>stomach is a "right." In implementing that "right," just exactly what will
>all the
>governments of the world pledge?
>To stop wars? Unlikely.
>To take from the haves and give to the have-nots? Likely.
>To eliminate unwanted people one way or the other? Very likely.
>
>Population Control is buried in the document with the words:
> 15. Objective 1.2:
> To ensure stable economic conditions and implement development strategies
>which
>encourage the full potential of private and public, individual and
> collective initiatives for sustainable, equitable, economic and social
>development which also integrate population and environmental concerns. To
>this end, governments, and as appropriate, in partnership with all actors
>of civil society, will:
>
> a. Promote policies in order to foster a national and international
>environment that is
>more conducive to sustainable, equitable economic and social development;
> b. Establish legal and other mechanisms, as appropriate, that advance land
>reform,
> recognize and protect property, water, and user rights, to enhance access
>for the
>poor and women to resources. Such mechanisms should also promote conservation
>and sustainable use of natural resources (such as land, water and forests),
>lower risks, and encourage investment;
> c. Fully integrate population concerns into development strategies, plans,
>and
>decision-making, including factors affecting migration, and devise
>appropriate
>population policies, programmes and family planning services, consistent with
>the
>Report and the Programme of Action of the International Conference on
>Population and Development (Cairo, 1994).
>
>So, it seems, this document, which will become part of a vast body of
>international law, proposes to provide "food security" via standard socialism
>on an international basis: Land reform (which already has caused nations
>like Zimbabwe to move from a food exporting country, to a food importing
>country), population control, violation of individual and even NATIONAL
>property rights.
>
>Susan Roylance, president of United Families International, who participated
>in the
>planning sessions for the document had success in getting into the document
>language which would recognize the importance of "families'in growing food
>and abolishing hunger.
>
>Somewhere between the writing of the document and the opening of the
>Conference, that language has again been taken out and strong pro-population
>control, anti-property rights language inserted.
>
>Julia Mavimbela, of Soweto South Africa, who has taught generations of
>children and
>adults gardening methods which provide better nutrition for very little
>money, will be a
>key member of the United Families International delegation. Robert Roylance,
>general manager for Farm Management Company, with the responsibility for
>managing numerous farms throughout the United States and is associated with a
>number of foreign farming operations, will present his paper "Population
>Control or Sustainable Agriculture?" at the World Food Summit.
>
> ----0----
>
> Practical Food Production Knowledge Is Ignored
> At Food Summit
> Robert Roylance - A Professional Farmer
>
>Robert C. Roylance grew up on a family farm, with four brothers and sisters.
>He has a degree in Agronomy and Agriculture Economics from Brigham Young
>University and owned his own farm when he was asked to become General Manager
>of Prior Land Company in Washington State. Currently he is a General Manager
>for Farm Management Company where he is responsible for managing numerous
>farms throughout the United States and is associated with foreign farming
>operations.
>
>A perfect resume for anyone interested in really learning how to increase
>food production?
>You'd think so. The United Nations delegates at the World Food Summit don't.
>They don't seem to be interested in those, like Bob Roylance, who not only
>know how to increase food production, but have a lifetime of experience doing
>it. The mind set in Washington DC, and at the Rome World Food Summit is that
>we MUST have fewer people.
>Especially those dark skinned ones. Roylance is expert in both small scale
>farming, family farming, and large scale commercial farming. In his report
>"Population Control or Sustainable Agriculture notes that through education
>of better agricultural practices, agriculture educators and government policy
>makers should encourage and train small scale farmers to become self
>sufficient. Many times it is difficult to maintain small scale farming when
>striving for free trade and promoting a higher standard of living for the
>population at large. An example of this in the financial difficulty the small
>rural Mexican farmer is currently faced with. They cannot compete on the
>world market due to their lack of (1)economically sized farm, (2) operating
>capital and (3) understanding the technical aspects of modern farming."
>
>All the problems he mentions are solvable. Many nations, including the United
>States and Canada, have solved them to such an extent "government's problem"
>is trying to stop them from producing too much. In America and Canada the
>people would not tolerate a Chinese style forced abortion policy to control
>population. Yet, that is the choice America is, in effect, giving the
>undeveloped nations. In order to receive "help" from the Western governments
>for increasing food production, they must first agree to a governmental
>policy on population control.
>
>Bob Roylance notes in his research paper: "It has been projected that the
>world population will double sometime around the year 2050, with the
>population growth rate stabilizing thereafter. This will require that the
>world food production be increased 2.5 to 3 times the current food
>production. This challenge can be achieved if the following actions are
>implemented:
>
>Utilize proven agriculture technologies that will optimize food production
>without
>compromising the environment. This includes the judicious use of fertilizers
>and
>pesticides.
>
>Support scientific research that will continue providing improvements in
>technologies used for crop and livestock production.
>Support and encourage the improved education of farm families in developing
>countries.
>Reduce trade barriers that will allow food to flow freely to all countries at
>lower prices.
>This will:
>allow food to be produced in areas that have a comparative advantage.
>result in more affordable food products, and improve the standard of living
>for the world - especially for the developing countries.
>
>The adoption of these actions will assure the world of an adequate supply of
>food well
>into the future without jeopardizing the sensitive nature of rural families.
>When policy
>makers come to the realization that the farmers of the world can provide
>ample food
>supplies, the energy they have been using to promote population control can
>be used to help strengthen existing families.
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail