Time: Wed Nov 13 16:28:46 1996 To: roc@xmission.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: another NWOW! Cc: Bcc: At 05:17 PM 11/13/96 -0500, you wrote: >> >>I invite you to do this for us, >>and report back here, if you >>can find a way to pay yourself >>for this private investigation. >> > Paul, Paul. Stay calm. I am calm. You are misreading an emotion into what I posted above, and what I posted before that. This may well be another one of those red herrings which we are supposed to chase to the ends of the earth, in a medium where the herring are much better equipped to navigate (read "swim"). For example, I recently had a "colleague" show me photos which he said were Russian heavy armor on I-25 in New Mexico, disguised as Red Cross vehicles. I finally got my hands on those photos, and shared them with my friends in the military (a major in the U.S. Army Reserve). They took it to their photo lab, scrutinized the photos carefully, and did me the enormous favor of telling me I had been misled: they were American military armored vehicles and transport carriers. They had no explanation for the Red Cross insignia, but they are well enough trained to overlook such superficial markings. So, this turned out to be quite a red herring. This is not to say that there are not really some Russian vehicles moving at night on our interstate highways; but, in this one particular case, they were red herring (disguised as U.S. Army trucks swimming down an interstate highway in New Mexico). 8-) /s/ Paul Mitchell I did not mean to insult you, > just to point out that there are a lot of alternative > explanations (quite legitimate) for this security for > detention centers business. I agree entirely. I am just resisting the idea, all too frequent these days, that I do the research at my own expense. I have better things to do with my professional time, believe me (and I hope you will). One way of diminishing my impact is to get me going in 43 different directions. I say this because I am quite capable of proceeding in 42 different directions; but everyone has their limit, and now you know what mine is. :) /s/ Paul Mitchell > > Maybe I will call them. Maybe? I'll tell'em a lot of possibly > bogus postings have been made on the net and what is their > description of what they do. And you are going to believe what they tell you, is that true? > > My lawyer makes $230, so I have plenty of expenses, don't > need to hire you to do this. A man is worthy of his hire: Very good advice from the Mind of the Maker. > > ciao, > > jcurtis I will tell you if I think you have insulted me. So far, you have not. /s/ Paul Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail