Time: Thu Nov 14 10:01:08 1996
To: "John Burr" <john.burr@qmail.eonetworks.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: People v. United States
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 08:52 AM 11/14/96 U, you wrote:
>I will see what I can do about the diminishing brief...I have to do some
>research in that area...it will fall right into line with my current research.

Oh, great, John.
I am happy to hear that.

> As far as sending 100 FRNs to those guys  at the Freedom Center...I  really
>do not trust them at all...especially seeing how they have screwed you.

Yes, it was just a thought.

We can now move quite independently
of them, given that People v. United States
has been removed and docketed in the
District Court of the United States
in Billings.  If they are truly free men,
they can join or not, intervene or not,
or do nothing.  I will not attempt 
to compel anyone, unless they have
a duty which they are failing to perform,
like paying a lawful debt for labor
performed to their complete satisfaction.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

  What
>assurance do I have that they will send the info?  None at all.

If their performance to date is any
indication, I would tend to agree 
with you.


  I will try to
>put something together for you on the Art III stuff based on my last comment
>about inflation to you....I was just asking for what you have done to date in
>that specific area only

Wasn't there a big case not too long
ago, in which several federal judges
sued on the inflation question?
I will need to pull some documents
from my filing cabinet, to see if I
can locate what I have.


...as I remember this applies to the FOIA hearing in
>Arizona that you have talked about..

Evans v. Gore is a good place to start.
Then, we can Shepardize it forward.
Lord v. Kelley is another good one.
There is also an excellent UCLA Law Review
article on the question, loaded with
lots of good cites.  


>
>
>John Edward
>------------------------------
>Date: 11/13/96 10:55 PM
>To: John Burr
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell
>
>
>Attached is the file GARFIELD.ZIP 
>which contains all the files I have
>to date on my computer.  The removal
>will have to be scanned in tomorrow, 
>in addition to the preliminary drafts
>of the FOIA request and appeal, and
>the application for intervention.
>Remember, The Freedom Center has not
>returned my personal belongings, 
>including the new ZIP drive I bought
>for the occasion, and several ZIP 
>cartridges, with all my backups on
>them.  I do not know if I will ever
>get those things back.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>
>******************* NOTE *******************
>There may be important message content
>contained in the following MIME Information.
>********************************************
>
>
>------------------ MIME Information follows ------------------
>
>--=====================_847957666==_
>
><<<<<< See above "Message Body" >>>>>>
>
>--=====================_847957666==_
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GARFIELD.ZIP"
>
>
>--=====================_847957666==_
>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>--=====================_847957666==_--
>
>
>
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail