Time: Fri Nov 22 20:14:02 1996 To: phyllis keys <pkeys@qn.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: USDC v. DCUS Cc: Bcc: At 11:09 AM 11/19/96 -0500, you wrote: >Mr. Mitchell, > After reading your material on the Federal grand jury and the U.S. >District Court and District Court of the U.S., I am wondering whether I have >any recourse. Yes you do. Final Notice and Demand for proof of power, standing, and jurisdiction, with a 5 day deadline. Upon default, you remove the action into the DCUS, and reverse roles: you become plaintiff, they become defendants, including the USDC judge as "Doe Number One." I was charged with 7201, grand jury indictment, I could never >get a copy of the evidence presented to the grand jury. > Do you have any suggestions? File FOIA request for the regulations which promulgate 7201; that will vault you into the DCUS. Also, file FOIA request for regulations which promulgate Jury Selection and Service Act, 28 U.S.C. 1861 - 1865 (same years as Civil War). Plea in Abatement is the correct procedure for challenging a faulty grand jury indictment. We have a general-purpose challenge to the federal Jury Selection and Service Act, complete with a Motion to Stay proceedings, pending final resolution of our challenge. I would much prefer that you retain me for $500 @$75 to guide you through the whole process. This buys you 7 hours + 1 free hour. Otherwise, I must focus my time on paying clients, and I may not be available to you if and when you need me. /s/ Paul Mitchell P.S. USDC has no criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. > Let me know when the next update or edition of The Federal Zone comes out >and I will send you a check for it. > Is the Justice Department exempt from answering FOIA's? No, definitely not. They are executive branch, and they are specifically NOT exempt. There are specific exemptions in the FOIA itself, however. /s/ Paul Mitchell >Thank you, > Robert Keys > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail