Time: Sun Nov 24 05:03:44 1996 To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Re: are you there? Cc: Bcc: At 12:11 AM 11/24/96 -0500, you wrote: >At 09:02 PM 11/23/96 -0700, you wrote: >>At 10:46 PM 11/23/96 -0500, you wrote: >>>At 08:24 PM 11/23/96 -0700, you wrote: >>>>Hi Nancy, >>>> >>>>I heard the phone ring, but I was >>>>busy in the other room. I hope >>>>I didn't miss your call. I would >>>>call you, but my finances are >>>>horrible right now. I am steaming >>>>mad about all the sabotage which I >>>>have witnessed in each and every >>>>case I have worked on, even to the >>>>point of convincing my clients not >>>>to pay my invoices. >>> >>> You should look for a pattern. Is there a type >>>of person who shows up over & over? Are you getting >>>into the same fight, over & over. >>> >>> I am coming to the dreadful conclusion that there >>>is something fundamentally wrong with the patriotic >>>movement. >> >> >>People can rationalize anything, Nancy. >>Look at the Nazi Storm Troopers, or the >>Hitler Youth. If people can rationalize >>what they did, it is a piece of cake to >>rationalize hypocrisy in the name of >>liberty. The Statute of Liberty is >>rusting at her core. You are onto >>something here: let's collaborate on >>a scathing indictment of the freedom >>movement, in part because they don't >>have the foggiest idea what it is, >>and in part because many cannot even >>spel it ("liberty" that is). >> > > That is one fantastic idea. You are on. > >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >> Oh, not everyone, I have met some of >>>the finest people I've ever known right here. But I've >>>also run into some of the worst dregs of humanity. >>>We tolerate fraud, hypocrisy, vicious gossip (ie, LT), >>>and just put up with behavior that would be ostracized >>>in the mainstream. All the time we malign those who >>>are either 1) successful and not giving it all to the movement, >>>or 2) not keeping up someone's elses version of God & >>>Christ. >>> Are we here to restore the constitution, or are we >>>here just to be wierd and nasty and get away with it? >>>This is a serious question. >> >>Freedom for some people means >>being weird, mean and nasty, >>and getting away with it. >>We used to call it "license," >>remember? > > No, I don't want a law against it. We just seem >to have mixed up legal and lawful, or legal and approved, >sort of like in the hemp movement. Being for legalization >does not mean you are pro drug, by any means. > Yet we mix up "first amendment" with just say, letting >Red Beckman sell his anti-semitic trash at events where >we'd have every right to take it down. And if someone is >mean and nasty, they don't need to be invited back. > Social sanctions for being impossible. That's what >used to work before government took over the morals >department. No, now we have social sanctions against me, >a divorced woman who dates. Good thing, if you ask me! Kind of like that old Bobby >Gentry song, "The day my momma socked it to the Harper >Valley PTA." > Could be a great book. Might even make mainstream, >unlike anything they've ever done . . . The Freedom Movement Post Mortem > >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >>> >>> The worst of >>>>the lot is New Life, who hired me >>>>as Vice President for Legal Affairs, >>>>but when I had the guts to tell the >>>>General Manager's wife to stay off >>>>the playing field, I had to go, >>>>even though officers have to be >>>>hired and fired by a Trustee. I am >>>>trying to decide if I will sue him >>>>for fraud (he rubber stamps the >>>>Trustee's signature, and fires officers >>>>but without authority in the trust >>>>indenture). He also made a big deal >>>>of a non-disclosure agreement with >>>>criminal liabilities, but when a little >>>>bit of pressure was put on him, he caved >>>>and turned over the records, without >>>>prior authorization by the Trustee. >>>>The level of hypocrisy, even on our side, >>>>is absolutely abysmal. >>> >>> Exactly. There are other groups working for >>>freedom, and I for one intend to find them. This LT thing >>>was the last thing, for me. A handful of friends wrote in >>>my defense, but with all the stuff I've done over the years >>>there should have been DOZENS of postings against her. >>>Some people just don't want to fuel it, I know, but I was >>>disappointed. They are blaming me for Bob's conviction. >>>He isn't. She calls me a tramp, but not one man I've really >>>dated has said a negative thing about me, even JJ. >>> I'm outta here. They ain't worth it. >> >>You have learned what you needed to know. >>Do not cast your pearls before the >>farm animals. Only problem is: some >>farm animals go in disguise, at all times >>and places of their choosing. > > Right again. Maybe I'll do that next, as a signature >line. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >>> >>> I had to tell this >>>>guy to back off, seriously, when he tried >>>>to throw me out of my apartment, after >>>>firing me and throwing me out of my office >>>>in his building. The guy can be vicious, >>>>I'll say that much. And I was warned. >>>>He is mesmerized by large breasts, I am >>>>sad to say. Nobody argues with his wife, >>>>absolutely nobody. But, of course, the >>>>racketball champion caves under a little >>>>pressure from the FBI, and this after he >>>>flaunts a court Order to appear and show >>>>cause. What did he think was going to happen, >>>>Cinderella? The man is 60 years old, and wants >>>>the whole world to think that he is this >>>>wonderfully expert Managing Director. >>> >>> What a kook. >> >>You can say that again. >> >> >> >>> >>>>Give me a break. Now he wants to retaliate >>>>against me, because I itemized all the >>>>damages I incurred from wrongful discharge, >>>>fraud, breach of contract, and breach of >>>>non-disclosure agreements. >>> >>> Hey, wait, Paul, principles here. There is no >>>right to a job. Laissez faire. Need more details, >>>but I have a big problem with this having been on >>>the other end. I would allow people to be fired for >>>telling a bad joke, if I were dicatator. >> >>Not if you were actually an officer, >>and you tried to fire another officer, >>when that can only be done by a >>Trustee. Catch my drift here? > > OK. He did not have the authority to fire you. >That's different. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >>> >>> His attorney just >>>>taunts me by reminding me that he is in >>>>bankruptcy now. That is EXACTLY what the >>>>United States is doing to everybody: damage >>>>people, and then hide behind a bankruptcy. >>>>I am just sick of this nonsense, just sick and >>>>tired of all of it. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>By the way, I am under surveillance. >>>>It's official now. >>> >>> Is anyone surprised? Any idea what for, or >>>just general dangerousness? Pipe bombs? ANFO? >>>Hemp? Vitamins? Sedition? What now, Janet? >> >>Two observant ladies noticed the >>"security" truck tailing me >>everywhere I went. They let me >>know this morning, in private. > > Been there, done that. We (me & Don) had a >commercial vehicle following us all day when Clinton >was here. >> >> >>> >>> (By the way, Janet, you are screwing up. You have >>>CI's well trained to pick on the weak & vulnerable and >>>win them over by becomeing indispensible. I really >>>could use some help with this packing, you know, why >>>don't you send your folks over? I'll even stop giving you >>>fashion advice over the wiretap, if that's the problem.) >> >>No amount of sniveling will ever >>permit me to forgive you for >>your "baggy" comments, do you >>hear me you licentious libertarianist. > > I was only trying to help, Janet. Don't be so sensitive. >> >>Reno in Reno, Oh NO!! >> >> >>> >>>> >>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>> >>>PS. I really do need that wine. I'll go easy. Tomorrow's >>>Sunday, so if I don't get it by midnite I can't get it at all. >>>I'll give you another ring when I get back, but first I'll >>>read your other post. I need dog food anyway. >> >>Potatoes might be more dignifying >>for a woman of your stature, Nancy :). >>How strong is your need for dog food, >>anyway? >> >>Maybe we both need a psychiatrist, >>you for your dog food habits, and >>me for my patterns. I must be working >>off a brother who would never even give >>me the time of day, even though he lived >>in the next room. Can that lead to chips >>on one's shoulder, just maybe? >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>>At 09:04 PM 11/23/96 -0500, you wrote: >>>>>At 07:02 PM 11/23/96 -0700, you wrote: >>>>>>Hi Nancy, >>>>>> >>>>>>The computer took much more time than >>>>>>I had anticipated. Western Digital >>>>>>tech support people recommended that >>>>>>I switch my main drive to the new >>>>>>1.6GB, instead of making it the secondary >>>>>>drive. This required copying everything >>>>>>from the old drive onto the new drive. >>>>>>Fortunately, everything went very well, >>>>>>including all the new hardware in my >>>>>>old 486. She is a real nice 2GB machine >>>>>>now, and 1.6GB is brand-new hardware. >>>>>>Yea team. >>>>>> >>>>>>If you are still up and about, give me >>>>>>a call and we can make some plans. I need >>>>>>some warm company, because so many people >>>>>>are falling out of their saddles here in >>>>>>Arizona. Neil has fallen victim to alcohol >>>>>>abuse: slurring his words, staggering in >>>>>>his own kitchen, spilling drinks often at >>>>>>the dinner table, and failing to understand >>>>>>complex legal and computer concepts. >>>>> >>>>>I too, have been resisting a trip to the liquor store >>>>>now for several hours. Packing alone. It's horrible >>>>> >>>>> "Another suitcase and another hall, >>>>> Take your picture off another wall" >>>>> >>>>>(Evita). >>>>> >>>>>I'll call. But I'm pretty down too, be warned. I found >>>>>the album of pictures from my other dog, Jamie, who >>>>>died in 1991 and I haven't totally stopped crying about >>>>>it. >>>>> >>>>>Your friend, >>>>>Nancy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I tried >>>>>>shock treatment, by confronting his wife in a >>>>>>letter, but it back-fired. Now they are very >>>>>>angry at me ("how dare I make this my business"). >>>>>>Problem is: Neil is going to die a very slow >>>>>>death if he keeps this up; pride is keeping >>>>>>him from seeing himself as he really is. I just >>>>>>can't take another one of these: my brother died >>>>>>of the same thing 5 years ago. I need some >>>>>>sunshine, laughter, and freedom. >>>>>> >>>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>>>>> >>>>>>=========================================================== >>>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>>>>>=========================================================== >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>======================================================== >>>>> Never Fight with a Skunk >>>>>======================================================== >>>>>Nancy Lord, M.D. >>>>>Attorney at Law >>>>>(912) 788-6272 >>>>>(912) 785-1809 Fax >>>>>defense@macon.mindspring.com >>>>>P.O. Box 7223 >>>>>Macon, Ga 31209-7223 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>=========================================================== >>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>>>=========================================================== >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>=========================================================== >>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>=========================================================== >> >> > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail