Time: Sun Nov 24 05:03:44 1996
To: Nancy Lord <defense@macon.mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: are you there?
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 12:11 AM 11/24/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 09:02 PM 11/23/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>At 10:46 PM 11/23/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>At 08:24 PM 11/23/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>Hi Nancy,
>>>>
>>>>I heard the phone ring, but I was
>>>>busy in the other room.  I hope
>>>>I didn't miss your call.  I would
>>>>call you, but my finances are
>>>>horrible right now.  I am steaming
>>>>mad about all the sabotage which I
>>>>have witnessed in each and every
>>>>case I have worked on, even to the
>>>>point of convincing my clients not
>>>>to pay my invoices.
>>>
>>>        You should look for a pattern.  Is there a type
>>>of person who shows up over & over?  Are you getting
>>>into the same fight, over & over.
>>>
>>>        I am coming to the dreadful conclusion that there
>>>is something fundamentally wrong with the patriotic
>>>movement.
>>
>>
>>People can rationalize anything, Nancy.
>>Look at the Nazi Storm Troopers, or the
>>Hitler Youth.  If people can rationalize
>>what they did, it is a piece of cake to
>>rationalize hypocrisy in the name of 
>>liberty.  The Statute of Liberty is 
>>rusting at her core.  You are onto 
>>something here:  let's collaborate on 
>>a scathing indictment of the freedom
>>movement, in part because they don't
>>have the foggiest idea what it is,
>>and in part because many cannot even
>>spel it ("liberty" that is).
>>
>
>        That is one fantastic idea.  You are on.
>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>  Oh, not everyone, I have met some of
>>>the finest people I've ever known right here.  But I've
>>>also run into some of the worst dregs of humanity.
>>>We tolerate fraud, hypocrisy, vicious gossip (ie, LT),
>>>and just put up with behavior that would be ostracized
>>>in the mainstream.  All the time we malign those who
>>>are either 1) successful and not giving it all to the movement,
>>>or 2) not keeping up someone's elses version of God &
>>>Christ.   
>>>        Are we here to restore the constitution, or are we
>>>here just to be wierd and nasty and get away with it?  
>>>This is a serious question.
>>
>>Freedom for some people means
>>being weird, mean and nasty,
>>and getting away with it.
>>We used to call it "license,"
>>remember?
>
>        No, I don't want a law against it.  We just seem
>to have mixed up legal and lawful, or legal and approved,
>sort of like in the hemp movement.  Being for legalization
>does not mean you are pro drug, by any means.
>        Yet we mix up "first amendment" with just say, letting
>Red Beckman sell his anti-semitic trash at events where
>we'd have every right to take it down.  And if someone is
>mean and nasty, they don't need to be invited back.  
>        Social sanctions for being impossible.  That's what
>used to work before government took over the morals 
>department.  No, now we have social sanctions against me,
>a divorced woman who dates.

Good thing, if you ask me!


  Kind of like that old Bobby 
>Gentry song, "The day my momma socked it to the Harper
>Valley PTA."
>        Could be a great book.  Might even make mainstream,
>unlike anything they've ever done . . .

The Freedom Movement Post Mortem


>
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>>
>>>  The worst of
>>>>the lot is New Life, who hired me
>>>>as Vice President for Legal Affairs,
>>>>but when I had the guts to tell the
>>>>General Manager's wife to stay off
>>>>the playing field, I had to go,
>>>>even though officers have to be
>>>>hired and fired by a Trustee.  I am
>>>>trying to decide if I will sue him
>>>>for fraud (he rubber stamps the
>>>>Trustee's signature, and fires officers
>>>>but without authority in the trust
>>>>indenture).  He also made a big deal
>>>>of a non-disclosure agreement with
>>>>criminal liabilities, but when a little
>>>>bit of pressure was put on him, he caved
>>>>and turned over the records, without
>>>>prior authorization by the Trustee.
>>>>The level of hypocrisy, even on our side,
>>>>is absolutely abysmal.
>>>
>>>        Exactly.  There are other groups working for
>>>freedom, and I for one intend to find them.   This LT thing
>>>was the last thing, for me.  A handful of friends wrote in
>>>my defense, but with all the stuff I've done over the years
>>>there should have been DOZENS of postings against her.
>>>Some people just don't want to fuel it, I know, but I was
>>>disappointed.   They are blaming me for Bob's conviction.
>>>He isn't.   She calls me a tramp, but not one man I've really
>>>dated has said a negative thing about me, even JJ.
>>>        I'm outta here.  They ain't  worth it. 
>>
>>You have learned what you needed to know.
>>Do not cast your pearls before the 
>>farm animals. Only problem is:  some 
>>farm animals go in disguise, at all times
>>and places of their choosing.
>
>        Right again.  Maybe I'll do that next, as a signature
>line.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>> 
>>>
>>>  I had to tell this
>>>>guy to back off, seriously, when he tried
>>>>to throw me out of my apartment, after
>>>>firing me and throwing me out of my office
>>>>in his building.  The guy can be vicious,
>>>>I'll say that much.  And I was warned.
>>>>He is mesmerized by large breasts, I am
>>>>sad to say.  Nobody argues with his wife,
>>>>absolutely nobody.  But, of course, the
>>>>racketball champion caves under a little
>>>>pressure from the FBI, and this after he
>>>>flaunts a court Order to appear and show
>>>>cause.  What did he think was going to happen,
>>>>Cinderella?  The man is 60 years old, and wants
>>>>the whole world to think that he is this 
>>>>wonderfully expert Managing Director.
>>>
>>>        What a kook.
>>
>>You can say that again.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>Give me a break.  Now he wants to retaliate
>>>>against me, because I itemized all the
>>>>damages I incurred from wrongful discharge,
>>>>fraud, breach of contract, and breach of
>>>>non-disclosure agreements. 
>>>
>>>        Hey, wait, Paul, principles here.  There is no
>>>right to a job.  Laissez faire.  Need more details, 
>>>but I have a big problem with this having been on
>>>the other end.  I would allow people to be fired for
>>>telling a bad joke, if I were dicatator.
>>
>>Not if you were actually an officer,
>>and you tried to fire another officer,
>>when that can only be done by a 
>>Trustee.  Catch my drift here?
>
>        OK.  He did not have the authority to fire you.
>That's different.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>>
>>> His attorney just
>>>>taunts me by reminding me that he is in 
>>>>bankruptcy now.  That is EXACTLY what the
>>>>United States is doing to everybody:  damage
>>>>people, and then hide behind a bankruptcy.
>>>>I am just sick of this nonsense, just sick and 
>>>>tired of all of it.
>>>
>>>        
>>>>
>>>>By the way, I am under surveillance.
>>>>It's official now.
>>>
>>>        Is anyone surprised?  Any idea what for, or
>>>just general dangerousness?  Pipe bombs?  ANFO?
>>>Hemp?  Vitamins?  Sedition?  What now, Janet?
>>
>>Two observant ladies noticed the
>>"security" truck tailing me
>>everywhere I went.  They let me
>>know this morning, in private.
>        
>        Been there, done that.  We (me & Don) had a 
>commercial vehicle following us all day when Clinton
>was here.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>       (By the way, Janet, you are screwing up.  You have
>>>CI's well trained to pick on the weak & vulnerable and
>>>win them over by becomeing indispensible.  I really
>>>could use some help with this packing, you know, why
>>>don't you send your folks over?  I'll even stop giving you
>>>fashion advice over the wiretap, if that's the problem.)
>>
>>No amount of sniveling will ever
>>permit me to forgive you for
>>your "baggy" comments, do you
>>hear me you licentious libertarianist.
>
>        I was only trying to help, Janet.  Don't be so sensitive.
>>
>>Reno in Reno, Oh NO!!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>
>>>PS.  I really do need that wine.  I'll go easy.  Tomorrow's
>>>Sunday, so if I don't get it by midnite I can't get it at all.
>>>I'll give you another ring when I get back, but first I'll
>>>read your other post.  I need dog food anyway.
>>
>>Potatoes might be more dignifying
>>for a woman of your stature, Nancy :).
>>How strong is your need for dog food,
>>anyway?   
>>
>>Maybe we both need a psychiatrist,
>>you for your dog food habits, and
>>me for my patterns.  I must be working
>>off a brother who would never even give
>>me the time of day, even though he lived
>>in the next room.  Can that lead to chips
>>on one's shoulder, just maybe?  
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At 09:04 PM 11/23/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>>At 07:02 PM 11/23/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>>>Hi Nancy,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The computer took much more time than
>>>>>>I had anticipated.  Western Digital
>>>>>>tech support people recommended that
>>>>>>I switch my main drive to the new
>>>>>>1.6GB, instead of making it the secondary
>>>>>>drive.  This required copying everything
>>>>>>from the old drive onto the new drive.
>>>>>>Fortunately, everything went very well,
>>>>>>including all the new hardware in my
>>>>>>old 486.  She is a real nice 2GB machine
>>>>>>now, and 1.6GB is brand-new hardware.
>>>>>>Yea team.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you are still up and about, give me
>>>>>>a call and we can make some plans.  I need
>>>>>>some warm company, because so many people
>>>>>>are falling out of their saddles here in
>>>>>>Arizona.  Neil has fallen victim to alcohol
>>>>>>abuse:  slurring his words, staggering in
>>>>>>his own kitchen, spilling drinks often at
>>>>>>the dinner table, and failing to understand
>>>>>>complex legal and computer concepts.
>>>>>
>>>>>I too, have been resisting a trip to the liquor store
>>>>>now for several hours.  Packing alone.  It's horrible
>>>>>
>>>>>        "Another suitcase and another hall,
>>>>>        Take your picture off another wall"
>>>>>
>>>>>(Evita).
>>>>>
>>>>>I'll call.   But I'm pretty down too, be warned.  I found
>>>>>the album of pictures from my other dog, Jamie, who
>>>>>died in 1991 and I haven't totally stopped crying about
>>>>>it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Your friend,
>>>>>Nancy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I tried
>>>>>>shock treatment, by confronting his wife in a
>>>>>>letter, but it back-fired.  Now they are very
>>>>>>angry at me ("how dare I make this my business").
>>>>>>Problem is:  Neil is going to die a very slow
>>>>>>death if he keeps this up;  pride is keeping
>>>>>>him from seeing himself as he really is.  I just
>>>>>>can't take another one of these:  my brother died
>>>>>>of the same thing 5 years ago.  I need some 
>>>>>>sunshine, laughter, and freedom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>>>
>>>>>>===========================================================
>>>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>>>>===========================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>========================================================
>>>>>                                    Never Fight with a Skunk
>>>>>========================================================
>>>>>Nancy Lord, M.D.
>>>>>Attorney at Law
>>>>>(912) 788-6272                                        
>>>>>(912) 785-1809 Fax
>>>>>defense@macon.mindspring.com
>>>>>P.O. Box 7223
>>>>>Macon, Ga 31209-7223                  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>===========================================================
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>>===========================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail