Time: Sun Nov 24 17:55:06 1996 To: marmstrong <marmstrong@snowcrest.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Re: Watching over me Cc: Bcc: At 12:17 PM 11/24/96 -0800, you wrote: >At 04:39 AM 11/24/96 -0700, you wrote: >>Hi Mar, >> >>I am honored to learn that you would >>share this story with me. No good >>swimming teacher would ever throw >>young students into a pool, before >>they had learned how to tread water. >>Why don't you write to the tax collector >>and explain that your "taxes" were paid >>under protest, because you have good >>reason to believe that all properties >>recorded as "fee simple" transactions >>in California are actually collateral >>for the federal debt under section four >>of the so-called 14th Amendment, and that >>this "amendment" was never lawfully >>ratified, under authority of Dyett v. >>Turner, Utah Supreme Court (1968)? >>In this way, you can ease into a matter >>which is volatile, and even terrifying >>to many people, to say the least. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >>P.S. See URL: http://www.supremelaw.com >> >Paul: > >Thanks for the suggestion. I will do that. >The Assessor is a personal friend of mine, >(and also a rancher and a bit of a rebel >at heart,) so he will probably ask me for >more info. so we can proceed with a friendly >dialogue to develop the issue further for >his, the Supervisors, and the Assessment >Board's illucidation. I shall have to search >through my records and be prepared to produce >my authorities. > >Carl will then, (if past experience serves me,) >probably, proceed up State Channels to raise >the question at that level. He always sends >me a copy of their reply which I will send >on to you. > >Glad to know you're apparently safe and OK. > >Marcia A. Only "apparently" for the moment. /s/ Paul Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail