Time: Sun Nov 24 18:37:42 1996
To: liberty@hollyent.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Nora Manella
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 18:28:25
>To: Dr.No@mbhbbs.playcom.com (Dr No)
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Nora Manella
>Bcc: Liberty Law
>
>Some of the Libertarians I have met
>over the years remind me of sailors
>who, upon seeing their first ice berg,
>remark how amazing it is to be seeing
>floating ice, never bothering to ask
>how much of the ice berg is actually
>under the water, out of sight, and
>out of reach.  
>
>Lots of warrants issued by Elizabeth Broderick
>entrained lots of marginal real estates
>in southern California;  many of those
>people were poor Hispanics, Vietnamese,
>and other ethnic minorities.  I addressed
>two of their weekend seminars, and many
>of them could barely speak English, much
>less understand lectures on constitutional
>law, commercial banking, and current affairs.
>
>At the back table where I sat, prior to 
>speaking on one occasion, nobody was speaking
>English, and when I tried to speak to them,
>they gestured to me that they did not understand
>my language.  These people were very vulnerable
>targets for a property conversion racket 
>orchestrated by agents within the Department
>of Justice, most probably in Los Angeles.
>
>My very rough estimate is that approximately
>5,000 people were entrained in this racket,
>via entrapment.  Broderick had recorded her
>Orange County lien in the "U S CRIMINAL COURT",
>which simply does not exist.  See Title 28
>of the United States Code for proof positive.
>
>Do you now see what I mean here?
>
>Or do I need to elaborate more of the ugly
>details?
>
>By sending Broderick to "study" under LeRoy
>Michael Schweitzer in Montana, the racket
>had, as one of its main purposes, a goal of
>impugning Schweitzer's lien practices, which
>were a great deal better than what the 
>Federal Reserve has been doing against the
>American People ever since 1913.  At least
>Schweitzer's liens were based on unrebutted
>affidavits.  The Federal Reserve is using
>commercial lien practices which are fraudulent,
>stem to stern.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail