Time: Tue Nov 26 07:39:33 1996 To: Jonathan Craft <jcraft@hitel.com>,dminer1380@aol.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: The Kick-Back Racket Cc: Bcc: At 08:27 AM 11/26/96 EST, you wrote: >Salutations. > >Could you e-mail me a copy of "The Kick Back Racket?" I >lost my e-copy. merged at end of this message > >An accountant I know is in prison. She was convicted >of some ludicrously bogus "embezzelment" charge. I >was told the prosecutor received $25,000 (tax free) >for her conviction and another $5000 for putting it >in the paper. I know she doesn't file 1040. Mark L. Zolton in IRS admitted, in writing, that PMRS awards were paid in cash (no records). See his letter merged below. > >I know of a few other people who would be interested >in the "Kick Back...". see "Supreme Law Library" at URL http://www.supremelaw.com Could you also mail a copy >to "dminer1380@aol.com". consider it done. David Miner is a friend >of mine. He has written a book "Tax Answers >the IRS doesn't want you to have" which is probably >on of the best "introductory" books to the income >tax fraud. How much does he sell it for? > >Any word from the IRS re: statutes imposing a liability >on individual/entites under FOIA? Yes, the letter is waiting in my inbox to be processed. They mentioned the 16th Amendment. > >Jonathan Craft >jcraft@hitel.com [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] For Immediate Release November 4, 1996 The Kick-Back Racket: Performance Management and Recognition System by Paul Andrew Mitchell All Rights Reserved (October 1996) It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of a conspiracy of silence which has descended upon the District of Columbia in recent months, that President Clinton has a lot of explaining to do, in quite a few executive departments. One of the best suppressed stories of his administration thus far is evidence of White House kick-backs from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for each and every indictment issued by federal grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are. The term itself is an oxymoron, because protest has never been illegal in America. Protest is even recognized by the federal government's precious Uniform Commercial Code for repudiating presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the phrase "illegal tax protestor" to withstand the obvious constitutional challenge (yes, the First Amendment is still the supreme Law in America), the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax." This is a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress of what many Americans have known for a long time, namely, the federal income tax is a total and utter fraud, from stem to stern. Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with loop-holes and sinking fast. What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak the truth. A key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM") clearly shows that the President routinely receives $35,000 from the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). We have a political prisoner in federal custody right now who is prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and every time a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys receive a mere $25,000 per indictment of ITP's. Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the former Pilot Connection Society which has been reported to have over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if his hench-persons in the DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury indictments against all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000 equals $175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is that the IRM provides absolutely no authority for these "performance recognition rewards" (read "kick-backs"). Courts have consistently ruled that the IRM has no more authority than a pizza recipe, when it comes to authorizing salaries and other The Kick-Back Racket: Page 1 of 3 compensation for federal government employees. Federal employee salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a far cry from that high standard of law. Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President from receiving any other "emoluments" during his term of office. See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them." A FOIA request by this author for all PMRS records produced an admission, on Treasury Department letterhead, that some records do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash. This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs with the perjury racket now rampant within the Department of Just US, and with a grand jury system which badly needs either complete overhaul or abolition, you quickly find that the indictments issuing from federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the Internal Revenue Code, are really threats, engineered by the biggest extortion racket this planet has ever seen. Jury tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do a far better job of describing what is really going on. In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena for certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona conspired with the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above. When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to investigate probable violations of federal law by the AUSA, the judge intercepted this certified request, and all subsequent pleadings which were then directed to the grand jury by Counsel in order to keep them informed of what was really going on. These pleadings contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it -- of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of pathological lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for repeatedly lying to a federal court in Phoenix. This was unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own. Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming that the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries, both grand and trial, is horribly defective for exhibiting obvious class bias against state Citizens who are not also federal citizens. The courts have consistently ruled that Americans can be state Citizens without also being federal citizens, whether or not the federal government's precious Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted (and we now know that it was not). Unfortunately for Congress, this class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title 28 United States Code Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each and every federal grand jury indictment, and each and every federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War. The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely no lawful authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that with the fact that the U.S. incarceration rate is twice as high as it is in South Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita. The Kick-Back Racket: Page 2 of 3 Do you think maybe that the federal government may be running an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so. I know so. I can prove it. I am appalled. Common Law Copyright Paul Andrew Mitchell Counselor at Law, federal witness and Citizen of Arizona state All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice November 4, 1996 # # # The Kick-Back Racket: Page 3 of 3 # # # Instructions for viewing the two files IRM1229A.PCX and IRM1229B.PCX: As the story goes, these two files were originally faxed into a fax/modem, then converted into .PCX format, so they can be viewed with the Microsoft Windows PAINT program, which all Windows users should have. For MS-DOS users, the files should come in .EXE format, which only needs to be copied into its own DOS directory and executed like any other DOS command. The file IRM1229.EXE decompresses itself and writes three files: README.TXT (the file you are reading) IRM1229A.PCX (page 1 of the fax) IRM1229B.PCX (page 2 of the fax) Except for the obvious annotations, the page from the Internal Revenue Manual is a faithful copy of the original. This is the page which contains evidence of the cash awards to the President and other government agents, paid through "Treasury". If President Clinton has been receiving these cash awards of $35,000 each, then he is violating Article I, Section 1, Clause 7 in the U.S. Constitution, which states that "... he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them." Rumor also has it that an anonymous Freedom of Information Act Request has been filed to obtain all financial records associated with the Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS) which is mentioned in the IRM. This rumor remains unconfirmed. It is also rumored that the Department of Defense is intervening to protect the agents who first filed this FOIA request, because the results are likely to cause widespread exposure of the multiple frauds being perpetrated by the IRS against the American People on behalf of foreign principals involved in a criminal syndicate of extortion, mail fraud, and outright terrorism. This rumor also remains unconfirmed. # # # Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Washington, D.C. 20224 September 12, 1996 Mr. Paul A. Mitchell Person to Contact: 2509 North Campbell - #1776 M. Zolton Tucson, AZ 85719 Telephone Number: (202) 622-6250 Refer Reply to: 96-1911 Dear Mr. Mitchell: This is in reponse to your July 26, 1996, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all financial records of the Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS). Your request was forwarded to us by the Office of Disclosure Services, Department of the Treasury, so that we can respond to you directly. We apologize for the delay in responding. Unfortunately, your request is not specific enough to allow us to conduct a search for the records that are of interest to you. For example, you have not stated the years for which you are interested in obtaining records. Please be advised that the PMRS has not existed for the last 3 years. In addition, it is our understanding that awards made under PMRS took the form of cash payments or quality step in-grade promotions. Therefore, the types of financial records associated with awards made under PMRS did not include the kinds of records mentioned in your request. It would be helpful if you could be more specific in descibing the desired records. Accordingly, you may wish to reformulate your request to assist us in finding the responsive material. If you decide to do so, your perfected request will receive our close attention. Sincerely yours, /s/ Mark L. Zolton Tax Law Specialist FOIA Branch # # # c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson [zip code exempt] ARIZONA REPUBLIC September 19, 1996 Mark L. Zolton Tax Law Specialist FOIA Branch "Internal Revenue Service" Washington [zip code exempt] DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Subject: FOIA for PMRS Records Your Ref. No. 96-1911 Dear Mr. Zolton: Thank you for your letter to Me, dated September 12, 1996. In that letter, you say that We failed to state the years for which We are interested in obtaining records. In answer to that point: We want records for the years 1776 Anno Domini through and including 2020 Anno Domini. The latter year (2020) appears on the IRS assessment records for a client of mine. Under oath, the IRS agent who signed these records testified that this date (2020) was not a mistake. We are desirous of obtaining any and all financial records associated with the PMRS, including but not limited to the names of all persons who received any kind of "recognition" from this system, e.g. the President as mentioned in the Internal Revenue Manual page in question, employees of the federal government, and all others, without exception. We presume the IRM reference is to the President of the United States. Your records should confirm whether or not any Presidents of the United States have received any "recognition" from this system, how much, when, and which ones. See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness and Counselor at Law # # # c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Tucson [zip code exempt] ARIZONA REPUBLIC November 5, 1996 Mr. Kenneth Starr Independent Counsel 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 490-North Washington, D.C. Postal Zone <20004> Subject: IRS Kick-Backs to President from the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS") Dear Mr. Starr: I have evidence in my possession which implicates President William Jefferson Clinton in the receipt of illegal IRS kick- backs from a defunct federal program called Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). As of yesterday, the Alta Vista search engine found some 20 documents on the Internet which mention this system. To obtain more information about PMRS, I have already submitted a Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") request to the Department of the Treasury for all financial records of the PMRS. Quite to my surprise, Mr. Mark L. Zolton wrote back to explain that some records do not exist, because the rewards were paid in cash. For your information, I have decided to become rather politically active in this matter. Enclosed please find my essay entitled "The Kick-Back Racket: Performance Management and Recognition System," which I enclose for your consideration and review. Please accept this as my firm offer to testify before a competent and qualified federal grand jury in this matter. I wish this matter to be investigated fully, and that is the main reason why I have brought it to your attention at this time. If I can assist you, or any others in your office, in the course of investigating PMRS, please contact me immediately. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law, federal witness and Citizen of Arizona state enclosures copy: Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit # # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail