Posted by Oh Really? on July 27, 1998 at 13:57:41:
In Reply to: Re: Or, Look at it this way... posted by New Kid on the Block on July 19, 1998 at 17:46:34:
I suggest New Kid take a minute and read Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 US 421 (1884) where the good ol' Supreme Court ruled that private parties are indeed required to accept FRNs as payment even when a contract specifies gold coin. You're 115 years behind the times Kid.
Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 US 421 (1884)
Post a Followup