Re: More Historical Evidence (legal ruse + deception) of 2 Classes of Citizens

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by MARTIN on September 16, 1998 at 11:02:34:

In Reply to: Re: More Historical Evidence (legal ruse + deception) of 2 Classes of Citizens posted by Two Cities on September 15, 1998 at 10:48:27:

Buy yourself this $40.00 book but do not use the non stactutory abatements.
The Book of the Hundreds Book of the Hundreds
Today's courts are there to enforce codelaw (rules + regulation) not to argue matters of law.
By E.O. FDR altered one word one word in the Trading with the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C.A. App., Sec. 1 et, seq.),which made people living in the states enemies of the United States, and subjected them for revenue purposes to licensure in all commercial activities. Instead of this Act (originally passed during WW1) applying to persons doing bussiness with the enemy 'without the United States' it was changed to read to 'within the United States'.(E.O. No. 2040, March 9, 1933 was ratified by Congress)
An address is federal + you are a postal customer in a commercial venue accepting the free benefit of mail delivery + pickup to your address.
RE:: I can understand how the "We the People" federation as you put it,
: could be dissolved. The underlying nations (states) with the State
: as their political representative, do not automatically dissolve because the
: union is compromised. That would have to take place with so many separate
: operations.

The northern States dissolved themselves voluntarily + re-coneved under the military authority of the federal GOV.. Read the Lieber code carefully especially concerning the collection of taxes and the take over of law enforcement by the occupying forces + or the installed Gov.
The old State gov.s could no longer collect taxes or enforce law so the were denied their existance.

The Attorney-General quite understates the effects of these Reconstruction Acts. Their actual effect is to restrain at once the holding of any election within the State for any [73
U.S. 50, 64] officers of the present State government by any of the State authorities; to direct all future elections in the State to be held under the direction of, and by officers appointed by, the military commander; and that all persons of certain classes described shall be the electors permitted to vote at such election. It is, therefore, an immediate paralysis of all the authority and power of the State government by military force; a plain setting aside of the
present State government, and depriving it of the necessary means of continuing its existence. It is substituting in its place a new government, created under a new constitution, and elected by a new and independent class of electors.

: : You can go live like the old order Amish or Quaker anytime you want. Do not deal commerce, operate a motor vehicle upon a PUBLIC roadway or become employed. (Lots of choices right?)

: Sounds impractical. Are they the only available role-models?
Pretty much so, no matter what anybody that wants your money tells you. Control yourself or law a enforcement agency will control you by force.

: : Most lawyer and legislative tricks deal in grammer, misnomer and peoples assumption.

: Got that far. The statute law committees tutorial on grammar
: is quite extensive.

: : Like Bo Bo Gritz told the Freemen; "the law has changed."
: :
: : Yes, Bo Bo knows the truth but he preached that the "Constitution" is Law the last I heard of him.

: : Pychological Operation most likely!

: Aren't they all?
Yes but which has your best interests in mind?
There are no lawful State Citizens recognized by any authority.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]