Posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on September 16, 1998 at 21:53:01:
In Reply to: Re: Reduced to the Absurd. (Tell that to the JUDGE!) posted by MARTIN on September 15, 1998 at 23:41:51:
We did "tell that to the judge" [sic].
Only problem was, he was NOT a judge, because
he would never produce evidence of the oath
of office required by 4 U.S.C. 101, nor would
After he erupted in anger and threatened Me,
we then filed a criminal complaint against him,
for threatening a federal witness and victim,
in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513, and for infringing
My fundamental Rights, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242.
I am a federal witness, and I am a federal victim.
As an eyewitness to federal offenses, I am required
to report such offenses, at risk of being charged
with misprision of felony. See 18 U.S.C. 1 thru 4.
Not long afterwards, he was taken off the case.
He is now implicated in other criminal offenses,
such as being an accessory after the fact to
mail fraud and bank fraud.
On the day that the jury issued its unanimous
verdict in My favor, the losing attorney wrote
a check for the exact amount of the judgment,
payable to Me.
While it was in the mail, he then called his
bank and stopped payment, giving "wrong amount"
as his reason. This was a blatant lie, and in
doing so, that losing attorney violated federal
criminal laws. His check was made payable for
precisely the exact amount of the judgment.
I feel sorry for you, Mr. Martin, because you
are quickly making enemies here in this forum,
and you are doing it to yourself.
It is gratifying to see St. Paul's prophecies
comes true, right before our very eyes.
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
authorities: People v. United States et al. (2 cases)
and USA v. Gilbertson (pending request for intervention)
Post a Followup