Posted by KatNip on September 21, 1998 at 23:22:15:
In Reply to: for Paul Mitchell: "the discussion on point"? posted by KatNip on September 21, 1998 at 23:12:18:
oops...for, "simply the supreme 'Statute' in
America", should have read: simply the supreme
'Statute' of the United (several) States
: With all due respect...
: you wrote, "We try to keep the discussion on point,
: and that is the Supreme Law in America."
: As I'm kind'a new to this group I'd appreciate
: you letting me, and perhaps other newbies, know
: exactly what "the discussion on point" is. I'm not
: certain what you mean by "Supreme Law in America."
: Are you referring to God's Law as being supreme Law
: in America or are you referring to a certain
: constitution? Again, with due respect...if it is
: a constitution to which you refer...isn't it, that
: constitution, simply the supreme 'Statute' in America...
: since Law proper, God's Law, is immutable whereas a
: constitution may be amended?
Post a Followup