Re: Dan Meador's Affidavit in re IRS Identity (1996)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by KatNip on September 28, 1998 at 22:33:06:

In Reply to: Dan Meador's Affidavit in re IRS Identity (1996) posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on September 28, 1998 at 18:36:49:

See the URL infra:

Dan Meador's affidavit in re IRS identity

Meador wrote at
"Obviously, it is impossible to replace a person with a thing
when it comes to administrative responsibility. However, the
order demonstrates that IRS and BATF are one and the same, merely
operating with interchangeable hats. Therefore, definitions and
designations applicable to one are applicable to the other."

res. Also persons are for some purposes and in certain respects regarded as things. Black’s Law Dict., p. 1172-73 (5th ed. 1979).

: See the URL infra:

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: See the URL infra: : Dan Meador's affidavit in re IRS identity : <http://www.supremelaw.com/library/nlhc/clerical.html> : Meador wrote at <http://www.supremelaw.com/library/nlhc/clerical.html> : "Obviously, it is impossible to replace a person with a thing : when it comes to administrative responsibility. However, the : order demonstrates that IRS and BATF are one and the same, merely : operating with interchangeable hats. Therefore, definitions and : designations applicable to one are applicable to the other." : res. Also persons are for some purposes and in certain respects regarded as things. Black’s Law Dict., p. 1172-73 (5th ed. 1979). : : See the URL infra:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]