Re: US Constitution: Analysis and Interpretation


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by ' on October 01, 1998 at 23:36:40:

In Reply to: US Constitution: Analysis and Interpretation posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on October 01, 1998 at 21:13:13:

Paul:I can see how your facts could be very convincing to a Patriotic type person not learned in legal matters.

If your facts were to be proved to be based on a false premise; like for example; the "We the People" constitution being the supreme law of the United States, do you not think that a person in prison could make an appeal on the grounds of brainwashing?

If the above were proved to be true, the United States GOV. would not have clean hands in this matter.

The US GOV. never specificaly specifys the "We the People" constitution.

Paul what are your thoughts on this important matter?

Maybe we could get Mr. Meader released?

: This is a truly excellent resource,
: organized by clauses and the cases
: which have adjudicated each.

: Its creation was authorized by Act of Congress.

: I recommend it highly.

:
: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

: Counselor at Law, Federal Witness
: and Private Attorney General




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]