Virginia State Constitution

Subject:

Comments:
: : : : : : : Some information regarding Washington, from a source deemed to be : : : : somewhat reliable. : : : : Thank you for your inquiry. ...[chomp]... : : : : The original constitution of 1878 is held by the Secretary of State's : : : : Division of Archives and Records Management. For more information, : : : : contact: : : : : Ms. Pat Hopkins : : : : Washington State Archives : : : : Office of the Secretary of State : : : : PO Box 40238 : : : : 1120 Washington St. SE : : : : Olympia, WA 98404-0238 : : : : 360/586-1492 : : : : An interesting Initiative to read is I648, available via the : : : : Washington State maintained site. Supposedly it never reached : : : : the ballot, due to nonsubmission of signatures. Wonder if the : : : : legislature just went ahead and passed it??? : : : : You must come to terms with the Tenth Amendment, : : in order to comprehend the essential differences : : between the federal and state governments. The : : states can exercise whatever powers are not : : prohibited to them, or reserved to the People, : : by the U.S. Constitution. For this reason, : : their taxing powers are much more broad and : : less constrained by apportionment and uniformity : : rules (which don't even apply to state govern- : : ments anyway). : : The Guarantee Clause does circumscribe what : : the state constitutions can allow. A major : : blow to all state constitutions was the : : OPENING BRIEF in USA v. Gilbertson. Limiting : : juries AND electors to a single class of : : federal citizens, invalidates ALL actions by : : juries so convened, and it also invalidates : : ALL elections by electors so limited. Congress has : : been remiss by failing to enforce the Guarantee : : Clause when new states joined the Union, and : : when amendments were enacted in the constitutions : : of the several states. We have now uncovered : : a colossal equal protection violation, with or : : without the so-called 14th amendment, because : : the International Covenant on Civil and Political : : Rights has as much force, pursuant to the : : Supremacy Clause, as the 14th ever had. : : : : To deny voting AND jury service to Citizens of : : the several states who are not also, by : : freedom of choice (read "Right of Election"), : : federal citizens (read "citizens of the United : : States"), is to force a clear and unmistakable : : violation of equal protection. Such state : : Citizens are thus FORCED into associating : : with a political jurisdiction which is NOT : : protected by the Guarantee Clause, in order : : to exercise their fundamental Rights to elect : : representatives, and to serve on juries. As : : such, these otherwise unalienable Rights have : : been "liened" upon, because federal citizens : : are taxed for exercising their unique political : : franchise. See 26 CFR 1.1-1(a) thru (c). : : All the pertinent authorities are available : : in "The Federal Zone," eighth edition. : : The most recent blow to the federal government's : : position on these matters, was the amazing : : discovery of a federal judge who ruled that : : federal citizens were NEVER contemplated by : : the Diversity Clause (Article III, Section 2). : : See elsewhere in this forum: "Diversity Clause : : is a Major Key." This proves, conclusively, : : that there was one and ONLY one class of : : Citizens prior to the 1866 Civil Rights Act. : : That means one -- NOT two, NOT three, and : : NOT zero. One and ONLY one!!! : : Sincerely yours, : : /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell : : Counselor at Law, Federal Witness, : : Private Attorney General, and Candidate : : for the U.S. House of Representatives

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: