Corporation Sole


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on November 12, 1998 at 03:52:46:

In Reply to: Re: Corporation Sole posted by Dr. L. David Sherry, Ph.D., Th.D. (h.c.) on November 11, 1998 at 17:16:34:

In support of the "theory" mentioned here.
the judge and prosecutor in the case of
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, in SLL,
repeatedly attempted to perfect the
assumption that the company was a
"corporation." One of our pleadings
specifically objected to this erroneous
presumption, but the judge and prosecutor
persisted, even over our detailed objection --
e.g. assumed facts not in evidence, and so on.

It's a very good theory, imho, well supported
by empirical experience.


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Counselor at Law, Federal Witness,
Private Attorney General




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]