Re: Deeds: An update


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Two Cities on September 18, 1997 at 03:03:50:

In Reply to: Re: Deeds: An update posted by Dennis on September 17, 1997 at 22:10:28:

: : : Deleted original note for expediency/space:

: There is a rather informative site you can visit pertaining to allodium...

: http://www.mm.mtu.edu/~pecampbe/action-allod1

: "allod2" & ..."3" are also available.

: #1 is something like 126k

: Dennis

Thanks. I have those (on my own drive just in case). I am
also aware of that the referencing page patents.html on
http://www.mm.mtu.edu/~pecampbe/ is inaccessible, so I don't
know what else there might be on this site. Informative in
the general sense, but the process of actually doing it, i.e.
required documentation for your own current deed and it's
trail, filing with county auditor, requesting the issuance
of a deed in your name from the municipality, history of
recent successes or failures, and by this I don't mean to stiff
some mortgage lender, but actually getting a taxing authority
to back down through their existing process. I am
assuming that Burlington Northern and Weyerhouser do not
pay tax on their patented holdings.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]