Re: More IRS Questions for the Wisconsin Senators


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Two Cities on September 24, 1997 at 21:27:29:

In Reply to: More IRS Questions for the Wisconsin Senators posted by Charlie@Sterling Investigations on September 24, 1997 at 16:37:16:

[chomp]

I read a document that alleges that the differences between public and private
law may be part of the problem. In those instances where the public has an
opportunity to participate voluntarily, they may avail themselves of the internal
bylaws of private corporations, such as the Federal Reserve, at which time they have
to comply, and perhaps assess.

Volunteering with the Federal Reserve might occur by merely 'touching' their structure
via a bank account, a bank note, a credit card, etc. thereby availing oneself of the
benefit of private credit, for which a fee may be charged by the owner of the credit
instrument. Possession never granted in terms of the 'money' represented by Federal
Reserve Notes. And the income tax, being an excise tax, could be a private fee charged
for the use of the benefit extended, and perhaps rightly so.

Who can provide the legal status of US Postal Money Orders. They appear to be able to provide
an interest free alternative, once launched into circulation. One
local grocer said they would honor.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]