Re: Paul Mitchell: There is 2nd witness to Constitution


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Common Right Group on December 30, 1997 at 17:08:54:

In Reply to: Re: Paul Mitchell: There is 2nd witness to Constitution posted by Committee for Original Intent on December 29, 1997 at 00:14:30:

: : : : : : : Me too.

: : : : : : : : Whether or not Paul is interested, I certainly am.

: : : : : :
: : : : : : Count me in! How or where can I research?

: : : : : Me also am interested in your three papers to be exact.

: : : : Great! I'm glad folks are interested. I am just learning how to even access this bulliten board -- my documents are in corel 7.0; how would I attach them to this message? If you can tell me, I'll do it. Otherwise, you'll have to email me so I can send them as an attachment. (I think I know how to do that!) The research we've been doing is amazing.

: : : Kudos Miken! Don't forget to include me now that I've shown you how to include attachments with your e-mail.

: : Herewith You have my email address as needed for attachment. Thanks, sammy

: Sorry sammy. Your email address wasn't in your message. When I read the rules, it said that email addresses may be left off. If anyone can tell me how to attach a document from a word processing program, I'll be glad to attach it for this board.

The method we use is to create or save the document in ascii format, then set the e-mail system to include documents as "attachments" rather than as "links" which attaches the ascii document to the message as a contuation thereof.
This method works for us, as we use WP 6.0, but others may be using som Corel Package, MS Word, or something else we can't read. The method we suggest is the best way we know at this time to maximize coverage and ensure readability by the recipient.
Others may know a better method.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]