Re: TRUSTS


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Two Cities on February 17, 1998 at 16:15:00:

In Reply to: Re: TRUSTS posted by Common Right Group on February 16, 1998 at 17:51:01:

: : [snip]

: : : You and about six gazzillion other people would be "interested in stealing - oops- reading it."

: : Six?

: : I presume verbs are connected to subjects, but sometimes my English isn't the best,
: : so were You suggesting that I was in contemplation of larceny, in My previous solicitation
: : for information? Or is that "quote" best viewed in the lite of a public forum, where many
: : keyboards wag?

: Maybe both. Only you know your intent in the solicitation.
: As to the latter, everyone that publishes anything in any form of public forum soon sees it "improved upon" by other "experts."

Again very reasonable. The 'net' information appears to sometimes
be a co-mingled collection of phrases, and sometimes promises of
one caliber or the other. To avoid having one's own "expertise"
improved upon, does of course require protection of


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Supreme Law Firm Discussion Forum ] [ FAQ ]