|
At
http://www.americanmemorials.com/memorial/deathnotice_private.asp?idMemorial=1317 is
“ObituryRegistry.com which describes itself as “ a service of
AmericanMemorials.com” It
has its own list of alleged AA11 victims. Its
not immediately apparent what the official status, if any, of this site is.Since
anyone can post anything they like on the internet, one needs to check these
things carefully. So
I followed some of the links to find out more about the site and its authors,
and its official status, if any. I clicked the link for AmericanMemorials.com
which took me here http://www.americanmemorials.com/ It
describes itself as the “The internet’s most complete database of current
obituaries and death notices. Searchable by name,city and state, keywords and
more.” It
invites one to create one’s own memorial for for $US49.95. Following various
links around the site gives no indication that it is anything other than a
commercial operation, with no official status. So it appears as if anybody could
create a memorial to anyone- real or fictitious - as long as they came up with
the $49.95. So lets have a look at the list for AA11. It
lists 90 innocents, and introduces two new names. Bill Weems and Timothy Ward.
So we now have 95 alleged innocents. Those missing from this list are Tu, Booms,
Vamsikrishna, Jalbert and Roux. There
are now a minimum of 8 fictitious innocents -unless someone wants to suggest
that there were 100 people aboard in total -or else get creative with the
practical application of abstract maths and suggest that the plane was hijacked
by a group of Arabs numbering minus three - in which case the media owes an
explanation for why it keeps publishing 5 names for these minus three
individuals. Someone
is fibbing. Here
is a summary of the anomalies between the lists. Collectively,
these sources list the names of 95 alleged innocents. CNN
lists 87 names, which should be a complete list ,but strongly implies that the
list is incomplete. The 7 left out are Vamsikrishna, Roux, Iskander,Jalbert,
Tu,Weems,Ward and Booms. USAT lists 86 names, citing this as a
“partial list”, Those missing are Caplin, Jalbert, Jude Larson, Natalie Larson,
Roux, Tu,Weems,Ward and Iskander. NBC
lists 87 names. Its the same as USAT with the addition of Iskander, but changes
Peter Hashem to Peter el-Hachem. PBS
is identical to NBC. The
Boston daily lists 89 innocents and describes it as a a partial list. Those missing are
Iskander,Vamsikrishna,Tu , Weems,Ward and Booms. It is the only list to name
Jalbert. A
year later it lists 87 names, changing Heath Smith to Heather Smith, Hashem to
el-Hachem , and losing Caplin, the two Larsons, Jalbert and Roux for Iskander,
Vamsikrishna.and Booms. The
“we will never forget” website lists 88 names. Those missing are
Vamsrikrishna,Jalbert, Booms, Tu,Weems,Ward and Roux. The
AA11 memorial website lists 90 names and claims 95 aboard. The missing names are
Vamsikrishna,Tu, Weems,Ward and Jalbert. Wikipedia
claims a summation of 93 aboard, but lists only 92 names (including
hijackers).It is the only site to list Lana Tu. Those missing are Iskander,
Vamsikrishna, Caplin, the two Larsons, Jalbert,Weems,Ward and Roux. This makes
it the same as the USAT list with the addition of Tu or put another way - the
Same as the NBC and PBS lists except that Tu is in for
Isaknder. The
American Memorials site lists 90 names and is the only list to name Weems and
Ward. It
leaves out Tu, Jalbert,Iskander,Vamsikrishna, Roux and
Booms. Several
sources claim that AA released 77 (or 75)
names on Sept 12, but the Washington Post published 89 names the same
day, and the Boston Daily published
89 - but not the same 89 - the day
after, while Fox News was still claiming that only 81 names were available a
week later. We
still cant rule out the possibility that Caplin/Kaplan is a genuine
co-incidence, but suspicion is justified, especially as Caplin is one of the
frequently missing names. Some lists have Peter el-Hachem, others Peter Hashem
Some lists have Heather Smith and others Heath Smith.Most lists have Antonio
Montoya but one has Antonio Montoya Valdes. Since the media which sells us the official
story universally agrees that there
were 92 aboard - 87 innocents and 5 hijackers, then 8 of these names (although
we cant yet specify which 8) must be fictitious. If 8 are confirmed as
fictitious, then we are perfectly entitled to speculate with some validity that
any number of the 95 could be fictitious. What
a mess ! This crime - the murder of approximately 3000 people , and the excuse
for two wars - and presumably more to come
- is supposed to have been properly investigated and documented ? Why
should we be expected to believe who the hijackers were, when the spin doctors
can’t even do a credible fabrication job of a list of innocent victims
? It’s
previously been demanded by many sceptics that we need to see a verifiable
official passenger list which actually contains the names of the alleged
hijackers. We can now take the implications of that further and point to the absence of
any passenger list documentation
which stands up to scrutiny as a credible document. We have nothing which could
support the existence of any of the alleged passengers on the alleged flight.
The
fact is - that in nearly three years - the media has tried to give the
impression that they have published valid passenger lists, when all that has
been provided is the contradictory rubbish exposed in this investigation. We are
left with no choice but to conclude that these AA11 lists are fabrications.
Personal stories of those allegedly involved have been built on the basis of
these fabricated lists. As qualified earlier, some of them may be real people,
who are really missing, but the passenger lists are lies. I
say “alleged flight” because the article linked below presents official
documentation that there was no such flight as AA11 on Sept 11,
2001. "What
really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001. by
Gerard Holmgren Nov 13 2003. http://sydney.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=36354&group=webcast The
article linked below presents documentation that if one is to use media reports
as the basis to claim the existence of such a flight, then one would have to
believe that there were two AA11s on that day. Flight
11 - The Twin Flight - by Woody Box http://physics911.org/net/modules/weblog/details.php?blog_id=28 This
website presents video evidence that the object which struck the Nth Tower of
the WTC was not a Boeing 767. Suggestions
for verifying this information for yourself. For
those who would like to seriously scrutinize my analysis - and I welcome and
encourage such scrutiny - here is a suggestion for a way to analyze this mass of
data while minimizing the likelihood of mistakes. Print
each list linked in this article. Choose 1 list as a reference list, which I
will call List 1. Count the names - at least twice - and write down the number.
Take list 2. Count the names - at least twice- and write down the number. Cross
check it ,name by name with list 1. On list 1 write down any names from list 2
which are missing, and on list 2, write down any names from list 1 which are
missing. Ensure that the
reconciliation of missing names matches the numbers of names on both lists. Take
list 3, count the names and write down the number. Cross check the names against
lists 1 and 2 in the same way, writing on list 3 any names missing from the
compilation of lists 1 and 2, and adding any new names appearing in list 3 to
the list of those omitted from 1 and 2. Ensure that the numbers match the name
discrepancies and move through the rest of the lists in similar fashion. This
was the method I used for this research. In
case anyone is thinking of removing or doctoring the lists linked in this
article, they’ve already been backed up and widely distributed. |