Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and
federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
zip code exempt
Under Protest, Necessity, and
by Special Visitation
MONTANA SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
GARFIELD COUNTY
People of the United States ) Case No. 2721
of America, ex relatione )
Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION:
) First Amendment,
Petitioners, ) Petition Clause;
) Universal Declaration of
vs. ) Human Rights;
) International Covenant on
United States et al., ) Civil and Political Rights,
) enacted with Reservations
Respondent. )
______________________________)
COME NOW the People of the United States of America (hereinafter
"Petitioners"), ex relatione Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,
Citizen of Arizona state (hereinafter "Relator"), to petition
this honorable Court to reconsider its Order, dated July 22,
1996, in which the Court dismissed the Petition with prejudice
and further found the Petition and all subsequent pleadings to be
frivolous.
Petitioners hereby respectfully wish to bring to the Court's
attention: (1) Their Petition, dated June 17, 1996, in which
they moved the Court for formal leave to appear in writing,
instead of being physically present, and (2) Their previous
Petition for Clarification of this Court's Order dated May 31,
1996.
Petition for Reconsideration:
Page 1 of 4
The Court has not ruled upon either of these two Motions and
its failure to do so has worked a prejudice upon Petitioners.
The issue of travel expenses currently weighs heavily upon
Petitioners, which issue was amply explained in Their Petition
for leave to appear in writing (June 17, 1996).
Moreover, Petitioners have not received the information
requested by Their FOIA request to the United States Department
of Justice, a copy of which was provided to this Court in Their
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND NOTICE OF SAME.
This Court's Order, dated July 22, 1996, and finding all
subsequent pleadings to be frivolous, was predicated upon a
failure by Petitioners to "appear" as ordered on July 22, 1996,
at 10:30 o'clock a.m. in the courtroom of the Garfield County
Courthouse. Petitioners previously provided formal notice to
this honorable Court of Their intent to appear, and respectfully
requested leave to appear in writing, as opposed to being
physically present, for the several reasons stated in Their
Petition to that end. An answer constitutes an "appearance";
cf. Black's Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition.
Finally, Petitioners have previously requested clarification
from this honorable Court of its Order dated May 31, 1996. Said
clarification is a prerequisite to providing this Court with
proof of its jurisdiction over the instant case.
RELIEF REQUESTED
Accordingly, Petitioners hereby respectfully request that
this honorable Court reconsider its Order dated July 22, 1996,
and rule on the two Petitions previously filed in the instant
case, but not yet decided.
Petition for Reconsideration:
Page 2 of 4
Dated: July 29, 1996
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Petition for Reconsideration:
Page 3 of 4
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Citizen of Arizona state,
do hereby certify, under the laws of the United States of
America, without the "United States," that I am at least 18 years
of age, a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and
that I personally served the following document:
PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
by placing one true and correct copy of same in first class
United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed
to the following individuals:
Attorney General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
zip code exempt
Solicitor General
Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
zip code exempt
Dated: July 29, 1996
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Petition for Reconsideration:
Page 4 of 4
# # #
Return to the Table of Contents for
People v. United States et al.