Time: Wed Oct 30 08:25:55 1996
To: "Geoffrey Stewart Nimmo" <nextwave@one.net>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: LAZARGRAM
Cc: fsphys@brunswickmicro.nb.ca
Bcc: 

At 09:49 AM 10/30/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Paul,
>
>Stanton Friedman is the leading researcher on the Lazar conundrum. 
>I offer you a letter he sent me yesterday.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Geoff
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (Waves!)
>
>----------
>From: fsphys@brunswickmicro.nb.ca
>To: Geoffrey Stewart Nimmo <nextwave@one.net>
>Subject: Re: The Purpose of the Philadelphia Experiment
>Date: Tuesday, October 29, 1996 10:51 PM
>
>Re Paul Mitchell's letter. The video he is referring to is the Bob Lazar
>piece. 
>It is science fiction. Lazar is not a scientist, has no degrees, has
>repeatedly 
>lied about his background.His scheme won't work, there is no stable element
>115. 
>Also at 99.9% of C, it only takes 20 months to go 37 light years. So forget
>
>"incredibly long times to reach such distant places at normal light speed."
>
>Alpha Centauri is less than 5 light years away.  
>
>
>Stan Friedman.


Dear Geoff,

Thanks so much for keeping
me in the loop.  I am obviously
out of my field here, but I do
try to monitor issues affecting
public energy policy.  Propulsion
for interstellar travel is one
such issue. 

Am I being too "linear" here,
or does it not take 37 years
(+ or -) to travel 37 light years
at 100% of C?  "C" is the same
as found in "E = M x C x C".

What am I missing, if anything?

Maybe you could forward this to
Stan for some clarification.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail