Time: Wed Oct 30 12:27:56 1996
To: pmitch@primenet.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:35 -0700 (MST)
>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>
>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:00 -0700 (MST)
>>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>
>>>From: tab@hollyent.com
>>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:41:24 -0700
>>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>>To: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>
>>>================[ Distributed Message ]================
>>> ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List)
>>> Type: Not Moderated
>>> Distributed on: 30-OCT-96, 11:41:10
>>>Original Written by: IN:ftbrady@cosmoslink.net.
>>>=======================================================
>>>
>>>
>>>OUT OF STEP Online #18
>>>Insights & Strategies for the New Individualist Left
>>>October 30, 1996
>>>Editor: Wally Conger
>>>============================================
>>>
>>>THE STARR INDICTMENTS II
>>>
>>>by J. Orlin Grabbe
>>>
>>>It looks like the mainstream media was right and I was wrong. Though perhaps
>>>not for the reason they think.
>>>
>>>I had followed the progress of the Starr probe carefully and knew when the
>>>first (unannounced) indictment was handed down in Arkansas. I also knew how
>>>angry Starr was at press reports he had "promised" not to announce anything
>>>prior to the November election, and how eager he was to get the indictment
>>>particulars out into the public domain. I also knew of at least five people
>>>who were indictment targets.
>>>
>>>But there were two glitches that affected the original timing. The first one
>>>was good: more walk-in witnesses. (More accurately, the witnesses were
>>>dragged in.) Their testimony greatly improved the conviction probability of
>>>the charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The second glitch was legal in
>>>nature. An outside review of the indictments as signed by the grand juries
>>>both in Arkansas and New York made important criticisms of the wording. So
>>>the indictments were rewritten both in Arkansas and New York earlier this
>>>month. The revised indictments had to be re-presented to the grand juries.
>>> But the revised versions had been signed in both locations by the end of day
>>>Friday, October 18.
>>>
>>>I anticipated the indictment particulars would be made public the following
>>>week. But no news was forthcoming. The first intimation I received there
>>>might be a change in plans was when an individual connected to the Starr
>>>investigation observed that the election wasn't really over until the state
>>>electors had cast their votes in December. This was offered as a simple
>>>observation, without elaboration.
>>>
>>>The second indication was when the Fifth Column said they would not be giving
>>>Bob Dole a second incriminating financial package prior to the election.
>>> (The first package induced Dole to resign from the Senate.) Explanation:
>>> "So as to not be seen as playing politics." Of course, it wouldn't be
>>>playing partisan politics if Clinton and Dole went out together.
>>>
>>>The final indication was the incarceration of Charles Hayes in Kentucky.
>>> Hayes had reminded me more than once: "Before this is over, it's going to
>>>get rough. Mark my words: It's going to get rough."
>>>
>>>I knew how rough it had already become. A silent war had been in existence
>>>for the past two months. A committee formed under the Emergency Powers Act
>>>was negotiating with Bill Clinton over his resignation, and Clinton was using
>>>his powers as President to fight them every step of the way. And I knew that
>>>this committee, not Starr, was in charge of the timing of the indictment
>>>announcements. The committee was trying to deal with a Criminal Presidency,
>>>on a neutral bi-partisan basis--but to keep things silently in the
>>>background. Hayes, as a participant in this fight, had deflected so many
>>>attempts on his life as to seem invulnerable. His incarceration showed how
>>>massive the battle had become.
>>>
>>>Of course, it is times like this that give definition to the term
>>>"fair-weather friends". But for the rest, here is what is important to keep
>>>in mind: This is only a temporary setback. It is not the end of the war.
>>>
>>>And battleship-size Roto-rooters have been prepared both for Bill Clinton and
>>>the U.S. Department of Justice.
>>>
>>>(October 27, 1996)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>========================================================================
>>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com
>>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>>>remove yourself from the list. Use HELP for a list of all commands.
>>>Questions/comments/problems?
>>> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com
>>>For information about this system email: info@hollyent.com
>>>========================================================================
>>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail