Time: Wed Oct 30 12:52:59 1996
To: Electra
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:44:57
>To: Nancy Lord
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: FOR YOUR EYES ONLY
>
>FOR YOUR EYES ONLY
>
>>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:42:04
>>To: "Harvest" <harvest@whitemtns.com>
>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>Subject: A Personal Request
>>
>>Dear Mr. Cooper,
>>
>>When I was a research associate at the
>>University of California, I had the good
>>fortune of working under a former Navy
>>Captain who helped bombard Iwo Jima.
>>He was an unusually kind man, who was 
>>also a great boss.  He once told me that
>>he was the one who did ALL the aiming and
>>firing for all four triple-gun turrets
>>which bombarded that island.  He didn't
>>want a miss to fall on the shoulders of
>>any of his sailor subordinates.  The
>>Marines, one of whom was my father, 
>>later remarked how precise the bombardment
>>was:  he could drop 12-inch shells right
>>down a chimney, and this from a battleship
>>listing and recoiling 5 feet from every
>>salvo.  
>>
>>I have a very urgent reason to contact him,
>>because I believe we are approaching a
>>high water mark of judicial corruption in
>>America, and I need to brief supportive
>>personnel in the Pentagon as to what is
>>really going on.  I am an eyewitness to
>>quite a few incidents of judicial tyranny,
>>and Title 18, U.S.C. Section 4, gives me
>>the authority I need to approach military
>>personnel.  The FBI is doing nothing but
>>push paper.  The Justice Department is 
>>complicit.  The Board of Governors of the 
>>U.S. Postal Service are sitting on their
>>hands.  On and on it goes.
>>
>>If we need to show some of these people
>>that we can overpower the U.S. Marshals,
>>particularly when they are covering for
>>the felonies of certain federal judges,
>>the only way to do that is to make a 
>>"presence" felt, preferably in some 
>>very subtle, but genuine ways.  My first
>>thought is to recommend that a number of
>>undercover ONI personnel become eyewitnesses
>>to similar events.  Such events now happen with
>>such a high frequency, they would not really need
>>to depend on hearsay or even affidavits to
>>witness personally what I am talking about.
>>
>>So, my request is this:  if I needed to 
>>reach this Captain in the Pentagon, would
>>you be willing to be a go-between so that
>>the Captain will know that my reason for
>>contacting him is genuine, and that I do really
>>need to meet privately with him, pursuant 
>>to 18 USC 4?  It has been many years since
>>I have had any contact with him, but he will
>>recognize me immediately, and will certainly
>>give us an audience, if only to catch up on
>>news from our respective lives.
>>
>>I would be most appreciative, Mr. Cooper.
>>
>>The only downside here is that the Captain
>>has probably retired already, but that should
>>be easy enough to find out.  He still would
>>be able to suggest a number of contacts to
>>us, once he hears the entire story.
>>
>>I am standing by.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell 
>>
>>
>>P.S.  I will be happy to learn PGP,
>>in order to encrypt subsequent email
>>messages on this subject.  Over and out.
>>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail