Time: Wed Oct 30 12:53:22 1996
To: Electra
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 23:31:36
>To: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com>
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Re: Research point
>
>At 11:26 PM 10/29/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>At 05:28 PM 10/29/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>At 05:49 PM 10/29/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>>>Tuesday, 29Oct96 @ 17:48 Hours CST
>>>>
>>>>TO: Paul Mitchell
>>>>From: Dale Robertson
>>>>Subject: Research Point
>>>>
>>>>Re-post to your at your request, as follows:
>>><snip>
>>>>Monday, 28Oct96 @ 14:37 Hours CST
>>>>
>>>>TO: Counselors - all
>>>>From: Joseph Dale Robertson
>>>>Subject: What is "United States" & Who is required to file a return?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At this time, there is an active pending case in the USDC and Bankruptcy
>>>>in which there is an opportunity (as well as necessity) to adjudicate
>>>>the the following issues:
>>>>
>>>>1. As it pertains to "income" as defined under Title 26 of the United
>>>>States Code, are individuals within the various 50 states within the
>>>>definition of "United States"?
>>
>>Dear Paul,
>> I may have already told you this, but
>>I saw that "State" definition somewhere too.
>>I believe its an old FDA statute, or maybe
>>something to do with importation. Will look
>>for it when this brief is finished.
>> How do I get on Alta Vista? I'm having
>>a lot of trouble using the Webb and I'd really
>>like to read your book.
>>
>>Nancy
>
>Hi Nancy,
>
>Using your web browser, use the
>search function, and scroll
>until you reach a list of choices.
>Alta Vista should be among them.
>If you can't find it, call your
>service provider, and ask for
>help navigating. When you find
>it, make a bookmark (or a favorite).
>Then, have some fun, because
>Alta Vista is fast Fast FAST.
>
>I can email you a copy of my book.
>What encodings can you handle?
>I can send in MIME, BinHex, and
>Uuencode. You have been able
>to read the ones I have sent you
>so far, correct? Chapter 11 is
>a good one, but you have probably
>already seen that chapter in the
>jury challenge I prepared.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>>>
>>>You are already stepping with
>>>the wrong foot forward. Title
>>>26, as such, has never been
>>>enacted into law, so it is, at best,
>>>rebuttable evidence of the law(s)
>>>in question.
>>>
>>>As for the IRC, the Kennelly letter
>>>is important evidence that the
>>>definition of "State" at IRC
>>>3121(e) embraces ONLY the named
>>>territories and possessions, and
>>>the District of Columbia.
>>>Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.
>>>
>>>Rep. Kennelly should be subpoened
>>>to testify about the evidence she
>>>received from the Legislative Counsel
>>>and the Congressional Research Service.
>>>She is from Connecticut. Go get her.
>>>
>>>Finally, "income" is not defined as
>>>such in the IRC. See U.S. v. Ballard,
>>>which rendered this question res
>>>judicata.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>2. Who is required to file a return?
>>>
>>>Anybody made liable.
>>>
>>>As for the income tax,
>>>as opposed to the other
>>>taxes discussed in the IRC,
>>>the only persons made liable
>>>are "withholding agents".
>>>Cf. in the definitions,
>>>IRC 7701(a) et seq.
>>>
>>>You can confirm this by
>>>submitting a FOIA request
>>>for all IRC statutes,
>>>other than those listed
>>>in the defintion of
>>>withholding agents, which
>>>impose a liability. The
>>>government will then be
>>>required to admit, on record,
>>>that there are no other
>>>liability statutes.
>>>
>>>Be aware that a FOIA request
>>>will thrust you into the
>>>District Court of the United States,
>>>where you belong anyway. Have
>>>you considered a removal action?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I am presently compiling a compendium respecting especially the first
>>>>and tangentially the second issue stated above.
>>>
>>>You need Kennelly's letter,
>>>and her testimony, under oath.
>>>Ask her why she never answered
>>>Paul Mitchell's letters. Or,
>>>get leave of the court to depose
>>>her. Her letter is earth-shaking
>>>(see Press Release infra).
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Should any counselor have comment, experience, interest, expertise, or
>>>>briefs respecting the above issues your response will be most sincerely
>>>>appreciated. Significant work has been done, and I have done some
>>>>interesting research on this point, but there is no compendium to which
>>>>I am aware which amalgamates the sum of argument(s) in one compendium.
>>>
>>>See "The Federal Zone" available
>>>on the Internet via the Alta Vista
>>>search engine.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Any counselor who makes make a submission will receive the end product
>>>>compendium and will be advised of developments as this issue proceeds
>>>>through the bowels of the USDC and the Bankruptcy forums.
>>>
>>>You know you are in the wrong
>>>court for any criminal prosecutions,
>>>don't you?
>>>
>>>
>>> (Hey, I have
>>>>to provide an incentive of some type - don't I?) Thanks and
>>>>
>>>>Constitutionally,
>>>>
>>>>Jospeh Dale Robertson
>>>>joseph.d.robertson@mail.nhmccd.tx.us
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>>
>>>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 28, 1996
>>>
>>>
>>> Congresswoman Suspected of Income Tax Evasion
>>>
>>>
>>>Payson, Arizona. Paul Mitchell, a Counselor at Law and Citizen
>>>of Arizona state, today challenged U.S. Representative Barbara
>>>Kennelly to stop evading the big question about federal income
>>>taxes: Does the term "State" at Internal Revenue Code 3121(e)
>>>include only the named federal territories and possessions of the
>>>District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and
>>>American Samoa? Can this be income tax evasion? Read on.
>>>
>>> In a letter to Mr. John Randall of San Diego last January
>>>24, Kennelly responded to a written request from Randall asking
>>>her if the word "State" in 26 U.S. Code 3121(e) and in other
>>>pending legislation were the same. Rep. Kennelly, a Democrat
>>>from Connecticut, first checked with the Legislative Counsel and
>>>with the Congressional Research Service about the definition.
>>>"According to these legal experts," answered Kennelly, "the
>>>definitions are not the same. The term state in 26 U.S. Code
>>>3121 (e) specifically includes only the named U.S. territories
>>>and possessions." Her letter to Randall, on official House of
>>>Representatives stationery, was dated January 24, 1996.
>>>
>>> This admission is earth-shaking, according to Paul Mitchell,
>>>who has conducted an in-depth investigation of federal laws and
>>>the U.S. Constitution for seven years now. If the Internal
>>>Revenue Code was deliberately written to confuse the American
>>>people into believing that "State" means "Arizona" or
>>>"California," when it does not, then the Congress has a lot of
>>>explaining to do. Mitchell has since challenged Kennelly to
>>>produce copies of the correspondence she received from the
>>>Legislative Counsel and Congressional Research Service, but she
>>>has now fallen silent and refuses to answer any follow-up
>>>letters. Congress, incidentally, exempted themselves from the
>>>disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act.
>>>
>>> Writing under several pen names, Paul Mitchell's work has
>>>reached all the way into the U.S. Supreme Court, which adopted
>>>"the federal zone" as a household word in their sweeping 1995
>>>decision in U.S. v. Lopez. His book entitled The Federal Zone:
>>>Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue, was first published in
>>>1992, and became an instant underground success for its lucid
>>>language and indisputable legal authority. The book was
>>>originally written in electronic form, which made it easy to
>>>disseminate through the Internet. The fourth edition can be
>>>viewed with the Alta Vista search engine, developed by Digital
>>>Equipment Corporation. The Internet version does not preserve
>>>any bold, underline, or italics, however. Mitchell has used
>>>special character formats to highlight important words and
>>>phrases in federal statutes and case laws, easing the reader's
>>>burden of deciphering an otherwise unintelligible code.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mitchell Challenges U.S. Rep. Barbara Kennelly: Page 1 of 2
>>>
>>> It is clear, there is a huge difference between the area
>>>covered by the federal zone, and the area covered by the 50
>>>States. "Money is a powerful motivation for all of us," writes
>>>Mitchell in a chapter from the book. "Congress had literally
>>>trillions of dollars to gain by convincing most Americans they
>>>were inside its revenue base when, in fact, most Americans were
>>>outside its revenue base, and remain outside even today. This is
>>>deception on a grand scale, and the proof of this deception is
>>>found in the statute itself." Indeed, the proof is now leaking
>>>out on official Congressional stationery.
>>>
>>> Mitchell goes on to argue, it is no wonder why public
>>>relations "officials" of the IRS cringe in fear when dedicated
>>>Patriots admit, out loud and in person, that they have read the
>>>law. It is quite stunning how the carefully crafted definitions
>>>of "United States" do appear to unlock a statute that is horribly
>>>complex and deliberately so. As fate would have it, these
>>>carefully crafted definitions also expose perhaps the greatest
>>>fiscal fraud that has ever been perpetrated upon any people at
>>>any time in the history of the world. It is now time for a shift
>>>in the wind. That shift is being driven by a growing
>>>understanding of personal status and its relation to government
>>>territorial jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> The vivid pattern that has now painfully emerged is that
>>>"citizens of the United States", as defined in federal tax law,
>>>are the intended victims of a modern statutory slavery that was
>>>predicted by the infamous Hazard Circular soon after the Civil
>>>War began. This circular admitted that chattel slavery was
>>>doomed, so the bankers needed to invent a new kind of slaves.
>>>These "statutory" slaves are now burdened with a bogus federal
>>>debt which is spiralling out of control. The White House budget
>>>office recently invented a new kind of "generational accounting"
>>>so as to project a tax load of seventy-one percent on future
>>>generations of these "citizens of the United States". The final
>>>version of that report upped the projection to eighty percent.
>>>"It is our duty to ensure that this statutory slavery is soon
>>>gone with the wind, just like its grisly and ill-fated
>>>predecessor," concludes Paul Mitchell.
>>>
>>> The fifth anniversary edition of The Federal Zone will be
>>>available before the end of the year. Copies of Mitchell's
>>>correspondence with U.S. Representative Kennelly can be obtained
>>>by sending email to pmitch@primenet.com, Mitchell's email address
>>>on the Internet.
>>>
>>>
>>> # # #
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mitchell Challenges U.S. Rep. Barbara Kennelly: Page 2 of 2
>>>
>>>===========================================================
>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>===========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail