Time: Wed Oct 30 13:09:26 1996
To: Electra
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord
Cc:
Bcc:
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 13:08:13
>To: "William C. Beeler" <cenmonet@socketis.net>
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: The Constitution
>Bcc: richard@caprica.com,neilnord@primenet.com,defense@mindspring.com
>
>Dear William,
>
>Because of a long string of clients
>who have chosen to believe a vicious
>lie that I am some kind of government
>"agent", and other such nonsense, I
>am currently out a rather substantial
>sum of fees which were never paid.
>It is now getting difficult to pay
>my rent, believe it or not. So, I will
>share this mail with my colleagues
>in the Supreme Law Firm, and see if
>we can come up with some recommendations
>for you. I would begin, as I always
>do with government personnel, by filing
>immediate FOIA requests for their credentials,
>including but not necessarily limited to
>their oaths of office, delegations of
>authority, fidelity bond (or surety),
>and licenses to practice law in the state(s)
>whey they operated (if any). Once these
>FOIA requests are filed, the clock starts
>running on the responses. After 10 working
>days (no weekends or federal holidays), a
>timely FOIA appeal is filed. After 20
>working days, all administrative remedies
>are exhausted, and you are eligible to
>compel production of the requested documents
>in the District Court of the United States,
>the court of original jurisdiction under
>5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). I can share with
>you here an electronic copy of the Citizen's
>Guide to the FOIA/PA, published by Congress
>in a rare moment of sanity. Be advised that
>this Citizen's Guide is wrong about the court
>of original jurisdiction; we have this on
>authority of a federal judge in Arizona,
>late last spring.
>
>I hope this helps. Please pass this message
>along to the people who need it.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>
>
>At 02:39 PM 10/30/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>Mr. Paul Andrew, Mitchell
>>
>>Dear Sir:
>>
>>This is something that may or may not be of
>>interest.
>>
>>An incident occurred in Southwest Missouri
>>last year and I believe was September 19th
>>1995, to a Mother of four children home alone,
>>who were terrorized by the Sheriff's deputies
>>dressed in black and armed with automatic weapons.
>>It also included one Highway Patrol Officer,
>>and later the BATF were brought in.
>>
>>In the end result she was vindicated and all
>>charges were dropped.
>>
>>She has tried to find a competent counselor to
>>initiate a class action lawsuit. The couple is
>>underfunded as lost their property fighting corrupt
>>first attorney and subsequent cost. The story is
>>quite lengthy and all documentation is available.
>>
>>The Rutherford Institute says that her case is a
>>good one but they themselves cannot find an attorney
>>who will or has time to take the case as it will require
>>a large amount of time and as usual there is no money
>>to advance to cover start up cost.
>>
>>Do you know of anyone who would be willing to tackle
>>this case and will provide the Lady's phone and fax
>>and address for contact and she will send all of the
>>necessary portfolio for review.
>>
>>I broke the story on the Internet and got her on the
>>airwaves for protection -- this is a story of abuses
>>of every amendment and would appreciate any advice or
>>assistance that can be offered. The Rutherford Institute
>>thought they had some firm in Arkansas that would take the
>>case but were covered until April before being able to
>>handle. She has an attorney here in Missouri that will
>>take the case but needs assistance.
>>
>>I know time constraints in this hectic world have everyone
>>grid locked. If you can find the time and have anyone who
>>might consider looking at the documentation and will
>>provide a mail address will see that the paperwork is sent.
>>
>>Respectfully
>>
>>William C. Beeler
>>Central Missouri Network
>>3801 Grace Ellen Dr.
>>Columbia, MO 75202
>>(573) 474 - 3083
>>(573) 886 - 8527 Fax
>>"William Beeler"<cenmonet@socketis.net>
>>***************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>****************************************************
>>>Objection. The Constitution is more
>>>than adequate for today's world.
>>>The States are empowered sufficiently
>>>to legislate for all the matters
>>>which are not within the power of
>>>Congress to legislate for the inhabitants
>>>and land of the state zone. A major
>>>"problem" with the Constitution, however,
>>>is that we cannot seem to agree on the
>>>exact provisions contained therein.
>>>But, that is not a problem with the
>>>Constitution, but with ourselves.
>>>
>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>
>>>
>>>===========================================================
>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com
>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>===========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@alterzone.com
>>>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail