Time: Wed Oct 30 14:25:27 1996
To: Harvey Wysong <hwysong@atl.mindspring.com>,hwysong@mindspring.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: router testing
Cc: 
Bcc: Neal Kelsey

Harvey,

I find two email addresses for you:
the one this message came from, and
the one you list in your "signature"
at the end.  Which one is current,
the former?

I am forwarding your message to the
Primenet executive, for evidence that
@mindspring.com is still working.
Although, if your server is 
@alt1.mindspring.com, would this
make a difference?

Many thanks.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 03:12 AM 10/27/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 07:58 AM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Dear Harvey,
>>
>>My email to Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com>
>>is being blocked for some reason.  I brought
>>this to the attention of a senior manager
>>at my ISP (Primenet).  He investigated and
>>recommended that we do some testing first.
>>It was his suggestion that I try sending email
>>to someone else @mindspring.com, and you came
>>to mind immediately.  So, if you do receive
>>this message, would you be so kind as to 
>>acknowledge receipt, and I will forward the
>>empirical evidence to Neal at Primenet 
>>headquarters?  Thanks very much, Harvey.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>You're coming in loud and clear. Nancy mentioned that she thought her mail
>was evaporating. I wonder why she said a thing like that.
>
>-- Harvey
>	****************************************************
>	TRIAL BY JURY PROTECTS ALL RIGHTS
>	****************************************************
>	"If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt 
>	for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it 
>	invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the 
>	criminal law the end justifies the means -- to declare that the 
>	Government may commit crimes in order to secure the convic-
>	tion of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retributions." 
>	--Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting, 
>	Olmstead et al. v. United States, 277 U.S. 485 (1928)
>	****************************************************
>	Please remember the above when you read about the deeds of
>	"confidential informants" on the government's payroll.
>	****************************************************
>	Harvey Wysong
>	National Spokesman, Fully Informed Jury Association
>	701 Longleaf Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, U.S.A.
>	hwysong@mindspring.com        (404) 266-0930
>	****************************************************
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail