Time: Thu Oct 31 05:58:06 1996
To: Harvey Wysong <hwysong@atl.mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: router testing
Cc: 
Bcc: 

At 04:44 AM 10/27/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Paul,
>        I believe that the "alt1.mindspring.com" should be
>"atl.mindspring.com" (as in Atlanta.mindspring.com). Mindspring is actually
>a far-flung empire now, and the city pops are inserted to help speed the
>mail. That way -- I believe -- the mindspring systems don't have to search
>for the local pop which serves the addressee.
>        I'm in Atlanta; Nancy's in Macon. An alternate address for Nancy is
>"defense@macon.mindspring.com.
>
>-- Harvey

Aha!  I will try it immediately.
Thank you very very much.

/s/ Paul Mitchell

>                ===================================
>At 02:26 PM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>Harvey,
>>
>>I find two email addresses for you:
>>the one this message came from, and
>>the one you list in your "signature"
>>at the end.  Which one is current,
>>the former?
>>
>>I am forwarding your message to the
>>Primenet executive, for evidence that
>>@mindspring.com is still working.
>>Although, if your server is 
>>@alt1.mindspring.com, would this
>>make a difference?
>>
>>Many thanks.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>
>>
>>
>>At 03:12 AM 10/27/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>At 07:58 AM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>Dear Harvey,
>>>>
>>>>My email to Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com>
>>>>is being blocked for some reason.  I brought
>>>>this to the attention of a senior manager
>>>>at my ISP (Primenet).  He investigated and
>>>>recommended that we do some testing first.
>>>>It was his suggestion that I try sending email
>>>>to someone else @mindspring.com, and you came
>>>>to mind immediately.  So, if you do receive
>>>>this message, would you be so kind as to 
>>>>acknowledge receipt, and I will forward the
>>>>empirical evidence to Neal at Primenet 
>>>>headquarters?  Thanks very much, Harvey.
>>>>
>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>
>>>>===========================================================
>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>>===========================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>You're coming in loud and clear. Nancy mentioned that she thought her mail
>>>was evaporating. I wonder why she said a thing like that.
>>>
>>>-- Harvey
>>>	****************************************************
>>>	TRIAL BY JURY PROTECTS ALL RIGHTS
>>>	****************************************************
>>>	"If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt 
>>>	for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it 
>>>	invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the 
>>>	criminal law the end justifies the means -- to declare that the 
>>>	Government may commit crimes in order to secure the convic-
>>>	tion of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retributions." 
>>>	--Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting, 
>>>	Olmstead et al. v. United States, 277 U.S. 485 (1928)
>>>	****************************************************
>>>	Please remember the above when you read about the deeds of
>>>	"confidential informants" on the government's payroll.
>>>	****************************************************
>>>	Harvey Wysong
>>>	National Spokesman, Fully Informed Jury Association
>>>	701 Longleaf Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, U.S.A.
>>>	hwysong@mindspring.com        (404) 266-0930
>>>	****************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================
>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>===========================================================
>>
>>
>	****************************************************
>	TRIAL BY JURY PROTECTS ALL RIGHTS
>	****************************************************
>	"If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt 
>	for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it 
>	invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the 
>	criminal law the end justifies the means -- to declare that the 
>	Government may commit crimes in order to secure the convic-
>	tion of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retributions." 
>	--Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting, 
>	Olmstead et al. v. United States, 277 U.S. 485 (1928)
>	****************************************************
>	Please remember the above when you read about the deeds of
>	"confidential informants" on the government's payroll.
>	****************************************************
>	Harvey Wysong
>	National Spokesman, Fully Informed Jury Association
>	701 Longleaf Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30342, U.S.A.
>	hwysong@mindspring.com        (404) 266-0930
>	****************************************************
>
>
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail