Time: Thu Oct 31 06:12:10 1996
To: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Please forward to Nancy Lord]
Cc:
Bcc:
Hi Nancy,
This came from <defense@mingspring.com>
Harvey tells me to use <defense@macon.mindspring.com>
I tried it this morning, and it did not bounce.
Did you get it?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
At 10:38 PM 10/30/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 22:37:42 -0500
>>To: Electra Briggs <electra@texas.net>
>>From: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com> <-------- Note
>>Subject: Re: [Fwd: Please forward to Nancy Lord]
>>
>>At 08:05 PM 10/30/96 -0600, you wrote:
>by mail1.texas.net (TxNet/Texas Net v1.2.2) with ESMTP id TAA23310 for
><electra@texas.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:18:47 -0600 (CST)
>[198.68.42.149]) by primenet.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id SAA27622 for
><electra@texas.net>; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:18:43 -0700 (MST)
>>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 18:18:43 -0700 (MST)
>>>To: <electra@texas.net>
>>>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord
>>>Status: U
>>>
>>>At 08:05 PM 10/30/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>>>Hi,
>>>> Remember me?
>>>>
>>>>Your friend,
>>>>Nancy
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Nancy,
>>>
>>>I most certainly do.
>>>Are you OK? I am working
>>>very hard on this problem.
>>>Ugrr is cranking up again,
>>>maybe nocal recipes, via
>>>silicon valleys. Later.
>>
>> You still don't get it. Check
>>where this one came from. I have
>>another box. That's what I'm trying
>>to tell you.
When I check, it's still same 'ol
<defense@mindspring.com>
>> Now, since they know it anyway,
>>it's league@macon.mindspring.com. See
>>if that goes through. If it's just the
>>kind of freak that Don was talking about,
>>it should.
I will try that too.
Did you get "ping" to
<defense@macon.mindspring.com>?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
>> If it doesn't, we are really in trouble.
>>Though defense is a sub-box of league,
>>so it may not work anyway, but I'd be
>>real suspect.
>> Don't use citizen. It's totally lost.
>>I even posted JJ, he can't get it either.
>>
>>Nancy
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail