Time: Fri Jun 13 13:00:07 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA26546;
Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:30:09 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 12:29:04 -0700
To: heritage-l@gate.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLF: OPENING BRIEF, U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, 8th Cir.
At 12:14 PM 6/13/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Paul,
>
>Per your previous message, this does show how messages posted
>can be made easier to read. And all should try to improve their
>format of possible.
Thank you. We have rejected all Windows-based
word processors, to settle back on WORD for DOS,
Version 5.0B, a truly fast, efficient, and
reliable program, if ever there was one.
Using this version of WORD, we use the "bug
screen" model: look at any screen door, and
look at the pattern formed by the horizontal
and vertical wires in the screen. This is a
character matrix, which we fill with equally
spaced Courier 12 characters -- same font as
you get in DOS EDIT.
We like to think of this screen as a Window Screen
-- it screens out Windows. :)
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
p.s. Bill Gates forgot how to do memory management.
>
>But the subject of this suit is very interesting, is this a
>suit to modify or radically change our beloved blood suckers
>at the IRS?
Yes. The Defendant was convicted of falsifying
a federal income tax return. Among the many
briefs we prepared for him was a NOTICE AND DEMAND
FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE of the genealogy
of the IRS, via Trust #62 in Puerto Rico. U.S.
Attorneys fell silent, again!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
>
>Mike Crane
>
>
>>
>> Excerpt from Appellant's OPENING BRIEF, due June 18, 1997,
>> U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, Gilbertson v. U.S. et al.
>> United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit,
>> Case Number #97-2099-MNST
>>
>> [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>>
>> Appellant submits that the vagueness and ambiguities which
>>
>> were introduced deliberately into the federal income tax system
>>
>> have resulted in a set of laws, statutes, regulations, rules,
>>
>> forms, practices, policies, procedures, and customs which are so
>>
>> terribly complex and intentionally deceptive, that the average
>>
>> federal citizen is very far from ever being able to understand,
>>
>> or decipher, the real meaning and intent of it all. These were
>>
>> the very same persons who were asked to render a verdict against
>>
>> Appellant in the instant case. Lex non cogit impossibilia.
>>
>> The combined result of this massive fraud is a travesty and
>>
>> a tragedy of the worst kind, because Appellant has succeeded in
>>
>> proving herein that there are, in fact, more than two hundred
>>
>> million Americans who find themselves situated in exactly the
>>
>> same position as Appellant. And that position is one in which
>>
>> the American People must now struggle daily, hourly, sometimes
>>
>> minute-by-minute, in the face of an ugly and premeditated
>>
>> extortion racket which now pervades the entire Land (both zones),
>>
>> in blatant violation of the fundamental principles which were set
>>
>> down more than two centuries ago in the supreme Law of this Land.
>>
>> Those principles have withstood every single challenge which
>>
>> has been mounted against their supremacy since they were first
>>
>> consecrated into Law on June 21, 1788, the first day of summer,
>>
>> the longest day of the year, Counselor's birthday, and the first
>>
>> day on which freedom had, at long last, become The Primary
>>
>> Principle upon which Our unique government was founded and
>>
>> dedicated, the day on which God's generous light from His intense
>>
>> burning Sun would shine the longest, and remain that way forever.
>>
>> Freedom. Oh, Freedom! Quo vadis, Freedom? Quo vadis?
>>
>> As against these immensely moving principles, which federal
>>
>> government employees now shirk at their own great loss, Appellant
>>
>> returns to the incredibly accurate prediction in Justice Harlan's
>>
>> courageous protest to the dangerous perils of the Downes Doctrine
>>
>> in Downes v. Bidwell infra. Long live protest! Quoting now:
>>
>> The idea prevails with some -- indeed, it found expression
>> in arguments at the bar -- that we have in this country
>> substantially or practically two national governments; one,
>> to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its
>> restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress
>> outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising
>> such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to
>> exercise.
>> [Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 at 380 (1901)]
>> [Harlan dissenting, emphasis added]
>>
>> To appreciate how alarmed Justice Harlan had become as a result
>>
>> of this new "theory", consider the following from His dissent:
>>
>> I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced
>> should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this
>> court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of
>> government will be the result. We will, in that event, pass
>> from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected
>> by a written constitution into an era of legislative
>> absolutism. ...
>>
>> It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of
>> a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds
>> lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher
>> duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority
>> to prevent all violation of the principles of the
>> Constitution.
>>
>> [Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 at 379-382]
>> [(1901), Harlan dissenting, emphasis added]
>>
>> The United States will now take careful note that We, the
>>
>> People of the United States of America, will not sit idly by, and
>>
>> witness the systematic destruction and premeditated violation of
>>
>> everything which We hold most dear. The principles We uphold
>>
>> herein, have been upheld by many courts of this great Nation;
>>
>> they were reiterated in People v. Boxer supra as follows:
>>
>> A practice condemned by the Constitution cannot be saved by
>> historical acceptance and present convenience.
>>
>> [U.S. v. Woodley, 726 F.2d 1328, 1338 (9th Cir. 1984)]
>> [emphasis added]
>>
>> It is obviously correct that no one acquires a vested or
>> protected right in violation of the Constitution by long
>> use, even when that span of time covers our entire national
>> existence and indeed predates it.
>>
>> [Walz v. Tax Commission of New York City,]
>> [397 U.S. 664 at 678 (1970), emphasis added]
>>
>>
>> # # #
>>
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
>> B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
>>
>> tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
>> email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
>> website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
>> ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
>>
>> As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
>> not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
>> ========================================================================
>> [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail